Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum

Ö Uludag, G.L. Morren, C.H. Dejong, C.G. Baeten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a new treatment for faecal incontinence. At present the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear. Modulation of the sacral reflex arcs might have an effect on rectal sensitivity, wall tension and compliance. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with faecal incontinence who qualified for SNM underwent barostat measurements before and during neuromodulation. An 'infinitely' compliant plastic bag with a volume of 600 ml was placed in the rectum and connected to a computer-controlled barostat system. An isobaric phasic distension protocol was used. Patients were asked to report rectal filling sensations: first sensation (FS), earliest urge to defaecate (EUD) and an irresistible, painful urge to defaecate (maximum tolerated volume; MTV). Rectal wall tension and compliance were calculated. RESULTS: During isobaric phasic distension each patient experienced all rectal filling sensations at the time of stimulation. Median volume thresholds decreased significantly during stimulation, from 98.1 to 44.2 ml for FS (P = 0.003), from 132.3 to 82.8 ml for EUD (P = 0.001) and from 205.8 to 162.8 ml for MTV (P = 0.002). Pressure thresholds tended to be lower for all filling sensations, but only that to evoke MTV was reduced significantly by stimulation (37.3 versus 30.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Median rectal wall tension for all filling sensations decreased significantly with stimulation. There was no significant difference between compliance before and during stimulation. CONCLUSION: SNM affects rectal sensory perception, but further research is required to clarify the mechanism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1017-1023
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume92
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005

Cite this

Uludag, Ö ; Morren, G.L. ; Dejong, C.H. ; Baeten, C.G. / Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 92, No. 8. pp. 1017-1023.
@article{0943e51fdc5f4965a672673f3e24e596,
title = "Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a new treatment for faecal incontinence. At present the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear. Modulation of the sacral reflex arcs might have an effect on rectal sensitivity, wall tension and compliance. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with faecal incontinence who qualified for SNM underwent barostat measurements before and during neuromodulation. An 'infinitely' compliant plastic bag with a volume of 600 ml was placed in the rectum and connected to a computer-controlled barostat system. An isobaric phasic distension protocol was used. Patients were asked to report rectal filling sensations: first sensation (FS), earliest urge to defaecate (EUD) and an irresistible, painful urge to defaecate (maximum tolerated volume; MTV). Rectal wall tension and compliance were calculated. RESULTS: During isobaric phasic distension each patient experienced all rectal filling sensations at the time of stimulation. Median volume thresholds decreased significantly during stimulation, from 98.1 to 44.2 ml for FS (P = 0.003), from 132.3 to 82.8 ml for EUD (P = 0.001) and from 205.8 to 162.8 ml for MTV (P = 0.002). Pressure thresholds tended to be lower for all filling sensations, but only that to evoke MTV was reduced significantly by stimulation (37.3 versus 30.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Median rectal wall tension for all filling sensations decreased significantly with stimulation. There was no significant difference between compliance before and during stimulation. CONCLUSION: SNM affects rectal sensory perception, but further research is required to clarify the mechanism.",
author = "{\"O} Uludag and G.L. Morren and C.H. Dejong and C.G. Baeten",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.4977",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "1017--1023",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "8",

}

Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum. / Uludag, Ö; Morren, G.L.; Dejong, C.H.; Baeten, C.G.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 92, No. 8, 01.01.2005, p. 1017-1023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum

AU - Uludag, Ö

AU - Morren, G.L.

AU - Dejong, C.H.

AU - Baeten, C.G.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a new treatment for faecal incontinence. At present the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear. Modulation of the sacral reflex arcs might have an effect on rectal sensitivity, wall tension and compliance. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with faecal incontinence who qualified for SNM underwent barostat measurements before and during neuromodulation. An 'infinitely' compliant plastic bag with a volume of 600 ml was placed in the rectum and connected to a computer-controlled barostat system. An isobaric phasic distension protocol was used. Patients were asked to report rectal filling sensations: first sensation (FS), earliest urge to defaecate (EUD) and an irresistible, painful urge to defaecate (maximum tolerated volume; MTV). Rectal wall tension and compliance were calculated. RESULTS: During isobaric phasic distension each patient experienced all rectal filling sensations at the time of stimulation. Median volume thresholds decreased significantly during stimulation, from 98.1 to 44.2 ml for FS (P = 0.003), from 132.3 to 82.8 ml for EUD (P = 0.001) and from 205.8 to 162.8 ml for MTV (P = 0.002). Pressure thresholds tended to be lower for all filling sensations, but only that to evoke MTV was reduced significantly by stimulation (37.3 versus 30.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Median rectal wall tension for all filling sensations decreased significantly with stimulation. There was no significant difference between compliance before and during stimulation. CONCLUSION: SNM affects rectal sensory perception, but further research is required to clarify the mechanism.

AB - BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a new treatment for faecal incontinence. At present the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear. Modulation of the sacral reflex arcs might have an effect on rectal sensitivity, wall tension and compliance. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with faecal incontinence who qualified for SNM underwent barostat measurements before and during neuromodulation. An 'infinitely' compliant plastic bag with a volume of 600 ml was placed in the rectum and connected to a computer-controlled barostat system. An isobaric phasic distension protocol was used. Patients were asked to report rectal filling sensations: first sensation (FS), earliest urge to defaecate (EUD) and an irresistible, painful urge to defaecate (maximum tolerated volume; MTV). Rectal wall tension and compliance were calculated. RESULTS: During isobaric phasic distension each patient experienced all rectal filling sensations at the time of stimulation. Median volume thresholds decreased significantly during stimulation, from 98.1 to 44.2 ml for FS (P = 0.003), from 132.3 to 82.8 ml for EUD (P = 0.001) and from 205.8 to 162.8 ml for MTV (P = 0.002). Pressure thresholds tended to be lower for all filling sensations, but only that to evoke MTV was reduced significantly by stimulation (37.3 versus 30.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Median rectal wall tension for all filling sensations decreased significantly with stimulation. There was no significant difference between compliance before and during stimulation. CONCLUSION: SNM affects rectal sensory perception, but further research is required to clarify the mechanism.

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.4977

DO - 10.1002/bjs.4977

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 1017

EP - 1023

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 8

ER -