@article{fce3ca4b3e8844a980ada3b9016e02a2,
title = "Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on maternity care and maternal outcome in the Netherlands: a national quasi-experimental study",
abstract = "Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns disrupted health care worldwide. High-income countries observed a decrease in preterm births during lockdowns, but maternal pregnancy–related outcomes were also likely affected. This study investigates the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown (March–June 2020) on provision of maternity care and maternal pregnancy–related outcomes in the Netherlands. Study design: National quasi-experimental study. Methods: Multiple linked national registries were used, and all births from a gestational age of 24+0 weeks in 2010–2020 were included. In births starting in midwife-led primary care, we assessed the effect of lockdown on provision of care. In the general pregnant population, the impact on characteristics of labour and maternal morbidity was assessed. A difference-in-regression-discontinuity design was used to derive causal estimates for the year 2020. Results: A total of 1,039,728 births were included. During the lockdown, births to women who started labour in midwife-led primary care (49%) more often ended at home (27% pre-lockdown, +10% [95% confidence interval: +7%, +13%]). A small decrease was seen in referrals towards obstetrician-led care during labour (46%, -3% [-5%,-0%]). In the overall group, no significant change was seen in induction of labour (27%, +1% [-1%, +3%]). We found no significant changes in the incidence of emergency caesarean section (9%, -1% [-2%, +0%]), obstetric anal sphincter injury (2%, +0% [-0%, +1%]), episiotomy (21%, -0% [-2%, +1%]), or post-partum haemorrhage: >1000 ml (6%, -0% [-1%, +1%]). Conclusions: During the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, a substantial increase in homebirths was seen. There was no evidence for changed available maternal outcomes, suggesting that a maternity care system with a strong midwife-led primary care system may flexibly and safely adapt to external disruptions.",
keywords = "COVID-19, Homebirth, Maternal health, Natural experiment, SARS-CoV-2",
author = "Gravesteijn, {B. Y.} and Boderie, {N. W.} and {van den Akker}, T. and Bertens, {L. C.M.} and K. Bloemenkamp and {Burgos Ochoa}, L. and {de Jonge}, A. and Kazemier, {B. M.} and Klein, {P. P.F.} and I. Kwint-Reijnders and Labrecque, {J. A.} and Mol, {B. W.} and Obermann-Borst, {S. A.} and L. Peters and Ravelli, {A. C.J.} and A. Rosman and Been, {J. V.} and {de Groot}, {C. J.} and E. Ambrosino and Auweele, {K. V.} and J. Been and R. Beijers and L. Bertens and N. Boderie and L. Burdorf and {Burgos Ochoa}, L. and {de Weerth}, C. and A. Franx and S. Harper and Klein, {P. P.} and D. Kretz and J. Labrecque and J. Muris and M. Nieuwenhuijze and S. Obermann and M. Oudijk and L. Ramerman and A. Ravelli and A. Schonewille-Rosman and J. Struijs and H. Torij and {Van Beukering}, M. and {van den Heuvel}, M. and {van Dillen}, J. and {van Lenthe}, F. and {Van Ourti}, T. and A. Verhoeff and M. Vermeulen and N. Visser and S. Willers and {Et al.}",
note = "Funding Information: This project was funded by ZonMW , Chiesi Pharmaceuticals , de Snoo-van \u2018t Hoogerhuijs Foundation , and Strong Babies . Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.024",
language = "English",
volume = "235",
pages = "15--25",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier Saunders",
}