Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability

D. J. Abson, H. von Wehrden, S. Baumgärtner, J. Fischer, J. Hanspach, W. Härdtle, H. Heinrichs, A. M. Klein, D. J. Lang, P. Martens, D. Walmsley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    61 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Ecosystem services research has become a major academic field, drawing in various academic disciplines, perspectives, and research approaches. The multifaceted concept of "ecosystem services" includes a normative component, which has strong implicit links to the notion of sustainability. Yet, how ecosystem services research relates to sustainability has received little attention. We reviewed the current state of research on ecosystem services, and examined whether the concept's original motivation has allowed it to act as an effective boundary object for the integration of the diverse knowledge related to sustainability. A full-text, multivariate statistical analysis of 1388 peer-reviewed publications on ecosystem services from 1997 to 2011 revealed a rapidly growing but fragmented body of research, which has emphasized the development of descriptive understandings of human-nature interactions. Future challenges for the ecosystem services concept include greater integration of currently fragmented knowledge domains and stronger engagement with the concept's normative foundations. ?? 2014 Elsevier B.V.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)29-37
    Number of pages9
    JournalEcological Economics
    Volume103
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Bibliographic analysis
    • Ecosystem services
    • Ethics
    • Multivariate statistics
    • Normative knowledge
    • Sustainability
    • Systems knowledge
    • Transformative knowledge

    Cite this

    Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A. M., Lang, D. J., Martens, P., & Walmsley, D. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012