Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Maastricht University
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Economic evaluation of nurse practitioners versus GPs in treating common conditions
Angelique T. M. Dierick-van Daele
*
, L. M. G. Steuten
, C. Spreeuwenberg
, J. F. M. Metsemakers
, H. J. M. Vrijhoef
, Emmy W. C. C. Derckx
*
Corresponding author for this work
Family Medicine
CAPHRI - Care and Public Health Research Institute
SHE - School of Health Professions Education
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
Academic
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Economic evaluation of nurse practitioners versus GPs in treating common conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Economic Evaluation
100%
Nurse Practitioner
100%
General Practice
50%
Direct Costs
50%
Study Practices
50%
Societal Perspective
33%
Healthcare Sector
33%
Randomized Controlled Trial
16%
Dutch
16%
Absence of Evidence
16%
Sensitivity Analysis
16%
Resource Use
16%
Cost-effectiveness
16%
Salary
16%
Practice Perspective
16%
Productivity Loss
16%
Practice-based Studies
16%
Contact Point
16%
External Reference
16%
GP Consultations
16%
Consultation Duration
16%
Follow-up Consultations
16%
Substitute Care
16%
Cost-plus
16%
INIS
cost
100%
evaluation
100%
economics
100%
patients
12%
resources
12%
comparative evaluations
12%
length
12%
design
12%
losses
12%
productivity
12%
sensitivity analysis
12%
salary
12%
Nursing and Health Professions
Economic Evaluation
100%
Nurse Practitioner
100%
General Practice
50%
Health Care Cost
33%
Cost Effectiveness Analysis
16%