TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic evaluation of nurse practitioners versus GPs in treating common conditions
AU - Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M.
AU - Steuten, L. M. G.
AU - Spreeuwenberg, C.
AU - Metsemakers, J. F. M.
AU - Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
AU - Derckx, Emmy W. C. C.
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - Background As studies evaluating substitution of care have revealed only limited evidence on cost-effectiveness, a trial was conducted to evaluate nurse practitioners as a first point of contact in Dutch general practices. Aim To estimate costs of GP versus nurse practitioner consultations from practice and societal perspectives. Design of study An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial between May and October 2006, wherein 12 nurse practitioners and 50 GPs working in 15 general practices (study practices) participated. Consultations by study practices were also compared with an external reference group, with 17 GPs working in five general practices without the involvement of nurse practitioners. Method Direct costs within the healthcare sector included resource use, follow-up consultations, length of consultations, and salary costs. Costs outside the healthcare sector were productivity losses. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Direct costs were lower for nurse practitioner consultations than for GP consultations at study practices. This was also the case for direct costs plus costs from a societal perspective for patients aged
AB - Background As studies evaluating substitution of care have revealed only limited evidence on cost-effectiveness, a trial was conducted to evaluate nurse practitioners as a first point of contact in Dutch general practices. Aim To estimate costs of GP versus nurse practitioner consultations from practice and societal perspectives. Design of study An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial between May and October 2006, wherein 12 nurse practitioners and 50 GPs working in 15 general practices (study practices) participated. Consultations by study practices were also compared with an external reference group, with 17 GPs working in five general practices without the involvement of nurse practitioners. Method Direct costs within the healthcare sector included resource use, follow-up consultations, length of consultations, and salary costs. Costs outside the healthcare sector were productivity losses. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Direct costs were lower for nurse practitioner consultations than for GP consultations at study practices. This was also the case for direct costs plus costs from a societal perspective for patients aged
KW - general practitioner
KW - cost analysis
KW - nurse practitioner
KW - randomised controlled trial
U2 - 10.3399/bjgp10X482077
DO - 10.3399/bjgp10X482077
M3 - Article
C2 - 20040165
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 60
SP - e28-e35
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 570
ER -