Echte verandering of natuurlijke schommeling?

Translated title of the contribution: Real change or natural fluctuation?

Judith M. Hilderink, Richard P. Koopmans, Roger J.M.W. Rennenberg, Marja P. Van Dieijen-Visser, Steven J.R. Meex*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

When monitoring patients over time, it may be difficult to distinguish 'real changes' from socalled 'natural fluctuations' when interpreting consecutive laboratory results. Consider a patient whose cholesterol level has decreased from a baseline 6.6 mmol/L to 6.1 mmol/L six months after receiving lifestyle advice. How likely is it that this is a 'real change', reflecting a lifestyle change, rather than random fluctuation? Physicians mostly rely on their intuition and clinical experience when interpreting changes in consecutive laboratory results. For inexperienced physicians, the lack of an easy reference for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results can make decision-making challenging. We have developed the medical/educational smartphone app Labtracker+ that calculates the probability of a 'real change' between two consecutive laboratory results, using biological variation data from scientific literature and analytical precision that is achieved in contemporary laboratories. This approach may complement intuitive, experiencebased interpretations of consecutive laboratory results.
Translated title of the contributionReal change or natural fluctuation?
Original languageDutch
Article numberD132A
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume160
Issue number32
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real change or natural fluctuation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this