TY - JOUR
T1 - Early Versus Delayed Invasive Management of Female Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
T2 - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
AU - Mills, Gregory B
AU - Kotanidis, Christos P
AU - Mehta, Shamir
AU - Tiong, Denise
AU - Badings, Erik A
AU - Engstrøm, Thomas
AU - van 't Hof, Arnoud W J
AU - Høfsten, Dan
AU - Holmvang, Lene
AU - Jobs, Alexander
AU - Køber, Lars
AU - Milasinovic, Dejan
AU - Milosevic, Aleksandra
AU - Stankovic, Goran
AU - Thiele, Holger
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Kunadian, Vijay
PY - 2025/3/4
Y1 - 2025/3/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Female patients are at greater risk of adverse events following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but less frequently receive guideline-recommended coronary angiography and revascularization. Routine invasive management benefits high-risk patients, but evidence informing the optimal timing of angiography specifically in female patients is lacking. METHODS: Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating early versus delayed timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were included. Individual patient data from female patients were extracted. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months. We performed a 1-stage individual patient data meta-analysis using random-effects Cox models. RESULTS: Six trials contributed individual patient data from 2257 female patients. Median time to coronary angiography was 5 hours in the early invasive group (n=1141) and 49 hours in the delayed invasive group (n=1116). Overall, there was no significant reduction in the risk of the primary end point in the early invasive group compared with the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; =0.12). Early invasive management was associated with a reduction in recurrent ischemia (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94]; =0.025). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 receiving early invasive management experienced a significantly reduced hazard for all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; =0.021; =0.035). Similar benefits were observed for female patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Early invasive management in female patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, compared with delayed invasive management, was not associated with a significant reduction in the hazard for the primary end point. In prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients as assessed with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 or elevated cardiac biomarkers experienced significant reductions in all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months following early invasive management. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023468604.
AB - BACKGROUND: Female patients are at greater risk of adverse events following non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome but less frequently receive guideline-recommended coronary angiography and revascularization. Routine invasive management benefits high-risk patients, but evidence informing the optimal timing of angiography specifically in female patients is lacking. METHODS: Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating early versus delayed timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were included. Individual patient data from female patients were extracted. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months. We performed a 1-stage individual patient data meta-analysis using random-effects Cox models. RESULTS: Six trials contributed individual patient data from 2257 female patients. Median time to coronary angiography was 5 hours in the early invasive group (n=1141) and 49 hours in the delayed invasive group (n=1116). Overall, there was no significant reduction in the risk of the primary end point in the early invasive group compared with the delayed group (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; =0.12). Early invasive management was associated with a reduction in recurrent ischemia (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94]; =0.025). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 receiving early invasive management experienced a significantly reduced hazard for all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; =0.021; =0.035). Similar benefits were observed for female patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Early invasive management in female patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, compared with delayed invasive management, was not associated with a significant reduction in the hazard for the primary end point. In prespecified subgroup analysis, high-risk female patients as assessed with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 or elevated cardiac biomarkers experienced significant reductions in all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction at 6 months following early invasive management. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42023468604.
KW - acute coronary syndrome
KW - coronary angiography
KW - myocardial infarction
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - women
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014763
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014763
M3 - Article
SN - 1941-7640
VL - 18
JO - Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 3
M1 - 014763
ER -