EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022

F.M. Carrano, A. Iossa, N. Di Lorenzo, G. Silecchia, K.M. Kontouli, D. Mavridis, I. Alarcon, D.M. Felsenreich, S. Sanchez-Cordero, A. Di Vincenzo, M.C. Balague-Ponz, R.L. Batterham, N. Bouvy, C. Copaescu, D. Dicker, M. Fried, D. Godoroja, D. Goitein, J.C.G. Halford, M. KalogridakiM. De Luca, S. Morales-Conde, G. Prager, A. Pucci, R. Vilallonga, I. Zani, P.O. Vandvik, S.A. Antoniou*, EAES Bariatric Surgery Guidelines Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Bariatric Guidelines Group identified a gap in bariatric surgery recommendations with a structured, contextualized consideration of multiple bariatric interventions.Objective To provide evidence-informed, transparent and trustworthy recommendations on the use of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, gastric plication, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, one anastomosis gastric bypass, and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity and metabolic diseases. Only laparoscopic procedures in adults were considered.Methods A European interdisciplinary panel including general surgeons, obesity physicians, anesthetists, a psychologist and a patient representative informed outcome importance and minimal important differences. We conducted a systematic review and frequentist fixed and random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) using the graph theory approach for each outcome. We calculated the odds ratio or the (standardized) mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA and GRADE methodologies. We considered the risk/benefit outcomes within a GRADE evidence to decision framework to arrive at recommendations, which were validated through an anonymous Delphi process of the panel.Results We identified 43 records reporting on 24 RCTs. Most network information surrounded sleeve gastrectomy and Rouxen-Y gastric bypass. Under consideration of the certainty of the evidence and evidence to decision parameters, we suggest sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and gastric plication for the management of severe obesity and associated metabolic diseases. One anastomosis gastric bypass and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are suggested as alternatives, although evidence on benefits and harms, and specific selection criteria is limited compared to sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/Lpv2kEConclusions This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, pertinent recommendations on the use of bariatric and metabolic surgery for the management of severe obesity and metabolic diseases. The guideline replaces relevant recommendations published in the EAES Bariatric Guidelines 2020.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1709-1725
Number of pages17
JournalSurgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques
Volume36
Issue number3
Early online date1 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Metabolic surgery
  • Severe obesity
  • EAES
  • Guidelines
  • CINeMA
  • GRADE
  • AGREE II
  • Y-GASTRIC BYPASS
  • LAPAROSCOPIC-SLEEVE-GASTRECTOMY
  • SWISS MULTICENTER BYPASS
  • MORBID-OBESITY
  • WEIGHT-LOSS
  • RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
  • DUODENAL SWITCH
  • CONSISTENCY
  • CERTAINTY
  • OUTCOMES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this