Duty-cycled unipolar/bipolar versus conventional radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Christine Tivig, Lam Dang, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Sibel Oezcan, Firat Duru, Christoph Scharf*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Duty-cycled (DC) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been introduced, however, data on large patient series and comparison to conventional RFA are scarce. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008 DC RFA was performed in 209 consecutive patients (143 (68%) paroxysmal and 66 (32%) persistent AF). As controls served 211 patients, 155 (73%) with paroxysmal and 56 (27%) with persistent AF (p=0.3). In DC RFA, the pulmonary veins (PV) were isolated followed by ablation at the septum and left atrium, if AF persisted. Conventional PV isolation was followed by anatomical lines at the roof and mitral isthmus. Results: Freedom of paroxysmal AF was demonstrated after 1.08 DC RFA procedures per patient in 82% and after 1.19 conventional procedures in 87% after 8.5 +/- 6.5 months (ns). In persistent AF, success rates were 79% after 1.35 DC RFA procedures and 80% after 1.34 conventional procedures after 11.5 +/- 8.5 months (ns). The subgroup analysis of 119 patients with follow-up >= 12 months (17.5 [14.1-23.6] months) showed similar results. Left atrial flutter occurred in 3% and 8% after paroxysmal AF ablation (p
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-191
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume157
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2012

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Duty-cycled radiofrequency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Duty-cycled unipolar/bipolar versus conventional radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this