Abstract
In this paper I use normative analysis to explore the curious and seemingly singular phenomenon whereby some dog owners deny the physical and moral facts about a situation where it is claimed their dog harmed or irritated others. I define these as epistemic and ethical denial, respectively, and offer a tentative exploration of their implications in terms of relational autonomy and responsible behaviour in public spaces.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7-12 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Bioethical Inquiry |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 1 Feb 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2023 |
Keywords
- Dogs
- Dog owners
- Ethics
- Epistemology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dogs, Epistemic Indefensibility and Ethical Denial: Don't Let Sleeping Dog Owners Lie'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver