TY - JOUR
T1 - Does unfairness evoke anger or disgust? A quantitative neurofunctional dissection based on 25 years of neuroimaging
AU - Gan, Xianyang
AU - Zhang, Ran
AU - Zheng, Zihao
AU - Wang, Lan
AU - Yang, Xi
AU - Klugah-Brown, Benjamin
AU - Xu, Ting
AU - Qiu, Nan
AU - Kendrick, Keith M.
AU - Mathiak, Klaus
AU - Tiwald, Justin
AU - Yao, Dezhong
AU - Becker, Benjamin
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the STI 2030\u2013Major Projects [grant number 2022ZD0208500 ]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82271583 ]; the University Grants Committee ( UGC ) [grant number GRF 17615525 ]; Seed Fund for Collaborative Research and PI research from The University of Hong Kong ( HKU ) [grant numbers 2407102536, 2402101713 ]; and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [grant number 512007073 - TRR 379 ].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Over the last decades, the traditional ‘Homo economicus’ model has been increasingly challenged by converging evidence highlighting the critical impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness in the Ultimatum Game, where humans willingly sacrifice personal gains to punish fairness norm violators. While emotional mechanisms underlying such costly punishment are widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions, particularly anger and disgust, remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations in conventional experiments. Here, we leverage a quantitative neurofunctional dissection approach that integrates recent advances in neuroimaging meta-analyses, behavioral-level, network-level, and neurochemical-level decoding, drawing on data from 3266 participants from functional neuroimaging studies to determine the common and distinct neural representations between unfairness and the two moral emotions. Our results reveal that experiencing unfairness engages a widespread bilateral network encompassing insular, cingulate, and frontal regions, with dorsal striatal regions mediating the decision to reject unfair offers. Disgust engages a defensive-avoidance circuit encompassing amygdalar, occipital, and frontal regions, while anger engages non-overlapping systems including mid-cingulate, thalamic, and frontal regions. Unfairness shares common activation with both anger and disgust, respectively, in the anterior and mid-insula, while the latter additionally shows common recruitment of ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Multimodal network, behavioral, and serotonergic decoding provide a more refined dissection of these results. Collectively, our results suggest a shared neuroaffective foundation through which emotions impact unfairness-induced punishment behavior, supporting the existence of a core brain circuit evolutionarily shaped to protect individuals from personal harm and enforce social norms.
AB - Over the last decades, the traditional ‘Homo economicus’ model has been increasingly challenged by converging evidence highlighting the critical impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness in the Ultimatum Game, where humans willingly sacrifice personal gains to punish fairness norm violators. While emotional mechanisms underlying such costly punishment are widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions, particularly anger and disgust, remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations in conventional experiments. Here, we leverage a quantitative neurofunctional dissection approach that integrates recent advances in neuroimaging meta-analyses, behavioral-level, network-level, and neurochemical-level decoding, drawing on data from 3266 participants from functional neuroimaging studies to determine the common and distinct neural representations between unfairness and the two moral emotions. Our results reveal that experiencing unfairness engages a widespread bilateral network encompassing insular, cingulate, and frontal regions, with dorsal striatal regions mediating the decision to reject unfair offers. Disgust engages a defensive-avoidance circuit encompassing amygdalar, occipital, and frontal regions, while anger engages non-overlapping systems including mid-cingulate, thalamic, and frontal regions. Unfairness shares common activation with both anger and disgust, respectively, in the anterior and mid-insula, while the latter additionally shows common recruitment of ventrolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices. Multimodal network, behavioral, and serotonergic decoding provide a more refined dissection of these results. Collectively, our results suggest a shared neuroaffective foundation through which emotions impact unfairness-induced punishment behavior, supporting the existence of a core brain circuit evolutionarily shaped to protect individuals from personal harm and enforce social norms.
KW - Amygdala
KW - Anger
KW - Connectivity
KW - Decision making
KW - Disgust
KW - Emotion
KW - Fairness norm
KW - FMRI
KW - Frontal cortex
KW - Functional neuroimaging
KW - Homo economicus
KW - Impulsivity
KW - Insula
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Meta-analytic connectivity modeling
KW - Moral
KW - Serotonin
KW - Thalamus
KW - Ultimatum Game
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106356
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106356
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 178
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
M1 - 106356
ER -