Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing

Jonathan van t Riet, Anthony D Cox, Dena Cox, Gregory D Zimet, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Bas Van den Putte, Hein De Vries, Marieke Q Werrij, Rob Ruiter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

151 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Health-promoting messages can be framed in terms of the beneficial consequences of healthy behaviour (gain-framed messages) or the detrimental consequences of unhealthy behaviour (loss-framed messages). An influential notion holds that the perceived risk associated with the recommended behaviour determines the relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages. This 'risk-framing hypothesis', which was derived from prospect theory, has been central to health message-framing research for the better part of two decades and has enduring appeal to researchers and practitioners. It has found its way into several health communication handbooks and is communicated to the general public. The present article examines the validity of the risk-framing hypothesis anew by providing a review of the health message-framing literature. In spite of its ongoing appeal, we conclude that the hypothesis has severe theoretical flaws. In addition, we find that the empirical evidence in favour of the hypothesis is weak and inconsistent. It seems that, in applying prospect theory's tenets to a health-promotion context, some of the theory's key aspects have been lost in translation. At the close of the article, we offer a research agenda for the future, arguing that, above all, new methodology is needed to bring the message-framing literature further.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 447-459
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Message framing
  • persuasion
  • health behaviour
  • risk perceptions
  • prospect theory
  • LOSS-FRAMED MESSAGES
  • SMOKING-CESSATION
  • RELATIVE PERSUASIVENESS
  • BEHAVIOR
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • INTENTIONS
  • DECISIONS
  • ATTITUDES
  • RESPONSES
  • NEED

Cite this

van t Riet, Jonathan ; Cox, Anthony D ; Cox, Dena ; Zimet, Gregory D ; de Bruijn, Gert-Jan ; Van den Putte, Bas ; De Vries, Hein ; Werrij, Marieke Q ; Ruiter, Rob. / Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing. In: Health Psychology Review. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 447-459.
@article{34759663e7254ae9ac67e87abd6392df,
title = "Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing?: Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing",
abstract = "Health-promoting messages can be framed in terms of the beneficial consequences of healthy behaviour (gain-framed messages) or the detrimental consequences of unhealthy behaviour (loss-framed messages). An influential notion holds that the perceived risk associated with the recommended behaviour determines the relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages. This 'risk-framing hypothesis', which was derived from prospect theory, has been central to health message-framing research for the better part of two decades and has enduring appeal to researchers and practitioners. It has found its way into several health communication handbooks and is communicated to the general public. The present article examines the validity of the risk-framing hypothesis anew by providing a review of the health message-framing literature. In spite of its ongoing appeal, we conclude that the hypothesis has severe theoretical flaws. In addition, we find that the empirical evidence in favour of the hypothesis is weak and inconsistent. It seems that, in applying prospect theory's tenets to a health-promotion context, some of the theory's key aspects have been lost in translation. At the close of the article, we offer a research agenda for the future, arguing that, above all, new methodology is needed to bring the message-framing literature further.",
keywords = "Message framing, persuasion, health behaviour, risk perceptions, prospect theory, LOSS-FRAMED MESSAGES, SMOKING-CESSATION, RELATIVE PERSUASIVENESS, BEHAVIOR, PERCEPTIONS, INTENTIONS, DECISIONS, ATTITUDES, RESPONSES, NEED",
author = "{van t Riet}, Jonathan and Cox, {Anthony D} and Dena Cox and Zimet, {Gregory D} and {de Bruijn}, Gert-Jan and {Van den Putte}, Bas and {De Vries}, Hein and Werrij, {Marieke Q} and Rob Ruiter",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/17437199.2016.1176865",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "447--459",
journal = "Health Psychology Review",
issn = "1743-7199",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing. / van t Riet, Jonathan; Cox, Anthony D; Cox, Dena; Zimet, Gregory D; de Bruijn, Gert-Jan; Van den Putte, Bas; De Vries, Hein; Werrij, Marieke Q; Ruiter, Rob.

In: Health Psychology Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.2016, p. 447-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing?

T2 - Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing

AU - van t Riet, Jonathan

AU - Cox, Anthony D

AU - Cox, Dena

AU - Zimet, Gregory D

AU - de Bruijn, Gert-Jan

AU - Van den Putte, Bas

AU - De Vries, Hein

AU - Werrij, Marieke Q

AU - Ruiter, Rob

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Health-promoting messages can be framed in terms of the beneficial consequences of healthy behaviour (gain-framed messages) or the detrimental consequences of unhealthy behaviour (loss-framed messages). An influential notion holds that the perceived risk associated with the recommended behaviour determines the relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages. This 'risk-framing hypothesis', which was derived from prospect theory, has been central to health message-framing research for the better part of two decades and has enduring appeal to researchers and practitioners. It has found its way into several health communication handbooks and is communicated to the general public. The present article examines the validity of the risk-framing hypothesis anew by providing a review of the health message-framing literature. In spite of its ongoing appeal, we conclude that the hypothesis has severe theoretical flaws. In addition, we find that the empirical evidence in favour of the hypothesis is weak and inconsistent. It seems that, in applying prospect theory's tenets to a health-promotion context, some of the theory's key aspects have been lost in translation. At the close of the article, we offer a research agenda for the future, arguing that, above all, new methodology is needed to bring the message-framing literature further.

AB - Health-promoting messages can be framed in terms of the beneficial consequences of healthy behaviour (gain-framed messages) or the detrimental consequences of unhealthy behaviour (loss-framed messages). An influential notion holds that the perceived risk associated with the recommended behaviour determines the relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages. This 'risk-framing hypothesis', which was derived from prospect theory, has been central to health message-framing research for the better part of two decades and has enduring appeal to researchers and practitioners. It has found its way into several health communication handbooks and is communicated to the general public. The present article examines the validity of the risk-framing hypothesis anew by providing a review of the health message-framing literature. In spite of its ongoing appeal, we conclude that the hypothesis has severe theoretical flaws. In addition, we find that the empirical evidence in favour of the hypothesis is weak and inconsistent. It seems that, in applying prospect theory's tenets to a health-promotion context, some of the theory's key aspects have been lost in translation. At the close of the article, we offer a research agenda for the future, arguing that, above all, new methodology is needed to bring the message-framing literature further.

KW - Message framing

KW - persuasion

KW - health behaviour

KW - risk perceptions

KW - prospect theory

KW - LOSS-FRAMED MESSAGES

KW - SMOKING-CESSATION

KW - RELATIVE PERSUASIVENESS

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - PERCEPTIONS

KW - INTENTIONS

KW - DECISIONS

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - RESPONSES

KW - NEED

U2 - 10.1080/17437199.2016.1176865

DO - 10.1080/17437199.2016.1176865

M3 - Article

C2 - 27062974

VL - 10

SP - 447

EP - 459

JO - Health Psychology Review

JF - Health Psychology Review

SN - 1743-7199

IS - 4

ER -