Abstract
Using two lab-in-the-field experiments, we study whether initial transgression leads to subsequent anti-social behavior. In the first stage, subjects participated in an experimental market game. In the second stage, subjects were given an opportunity to participate in anti-social experiment. We find that subjects who impose a negative externality on uninvolved third parties in the market game are also more likely to burn their partner's income in the second experiment. This finding is consistent with a consciencenumbing effect but could possibly also be explained by participants' preferences for consistency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-48 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Review of Behavioral Economics |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
JEL classifications
- c93 - Field Experiments
- d03 - Behavioral Economics: Underlying Principles (Outdated)
- d62 - Externalities
- d63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- m14 - "Corporate Culture; Social Responsibility"
Keywords
- joy-of-destruction experiment
- Markets
- negative externality
- conscience numbing
- moral licensing
- moral cleansing
- anti-social behavior
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does Moral Transgression Promote Anti-social Behavior? Evidence from Lab-in-the-Field Experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver