TY - JOUR
T1 - Do we care? Reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary intellectual disability care
T2 - a retrospective chart review
AU - Muller, Annelieke R.
AU - Boot, Erik
AU - Notermans, Stijn B.
AU - Schuengel, Carlo
AU - Henneman, Lidewij
AU - Cornel, Martina C.
AU - van Haelst, Mieke M.
AU - Alders, Marielle
AU - van Karnebeek, Clara D. M.
AU - Bijl, Bas
AU - Wijburg, Frits A.
AU - van Eeghen, Agnies M.
PY - 2024/9/16
Y1 - 2024/9/16
N2 - BackgroundAdvances in understanding the etiology of intellectual disability (ID) has led to insights in potential (targeted) treatments and personalized care. Implications of ID on health are often complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The aim was to investigate the reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary ID care and to identify associated clinical and demographic factors.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on a randomly selected sample of individuals (n = 380) of a large ID care organization in the Netherlands. Data on genetic etiology, including genetic testing and diagnoses, and clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from files held by multidisciplinary team members.ResultsReports on genetic etiology were available in 40% of the study sample (n = 151), with a genetic diagnosis recorded in 34% (n = 51), which is 13% of the total sample. In those with reported genetic diagnoses, this was reported in 90% of medical, 39% of psychodiagnostic, and 75% of professional caregivers' files. Older age, mild ID, and the legal representative not being a family member were associated with less reported information on genetic etiology.ConclusionsThis study revealed that genetic diagnoses were often not reported in ID care files. Recommendations were formulated to reduce delay in diagnosis, and enable personalized care for individuals with ID.
AB - BackgroundAdvances in understanding the etiology of intellectual disability (ID) has led to insights in potential (targeted) treatments and personalized care. Implications of ID on health are often complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The aim was to investigate the reporting of genetic diagnoses in multidisciplinary ID care and to identify associated clinical and demographic factors.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on a randomly selected sample of individuals (n = 380) of a large ID care organization in the Netherlands. Data on genetic etiology, including genetic testing and diagnoses, and clinical and demographic characteristics were collected from files held by multidisciplinary team members.ResultsReports on genetic etiology were available in 40% of the study sample (n = 151), with a genetic diagnosis recorded in 34% (n = 51), which is 13% of the total sample. In those with reported genetic diagnoses, this was reported in 90% of medical, 39% of psychodiagnostic, and 75% of professional caregivers' files. Older age, mild ID, and the legal representative not being a family member were associated with less reported information on genetic etiology.ConclusionsThis study revealed that genetic diagnoses were often not reported in ID care files. Recommendations were formulated to reduce delay in diagnosis, and enable personalized care for individuals with ID.
KW - Intellectual disability
KW - Genetic diagnosis
KW - Diagnostics
KW - Genetic testing
KW - Behavioral phenotype
KW - Multidisciplinary care
KW - Care files
KW - Psychodiagnostics
KW - Caregivers
KW - Personalized medicine
KW - CHILD
U2 - 10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6
DO - 10.1186/s13023-024-03323-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1750-1172
VL - 19
JO - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
JF - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
IS - 1
M1 - 346
ER -