Do Restrained Eaters Show Attention Toward or Away From Food, Shape and Weight Stimuli?

B.J.F. Boon, L. Vogelzang, A.T.M. Jansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Present study was designed to examine whether the frequently found prolonged colour naming of food words in Stroop, tasks in people who restrain their food intake is due to hyperattention to or avoidance of these food words. MacLeod's visual attention (or dot probe) paradigm (MacLeod et al., 1986) was used, as well as a word recognition task. Food, weight/shape and neutral words were presented. Fifty-nine women, classified as restrained or unrestrained eaters, participated in both tasks. The visual attention task revealed neither attention nor avoidance of food and weight/ shape stimuli. In the recognition task, however, restrained subjects were found to need less time for recognizing food words than neutral words. For unrestrained eaters, the response times for food and neutral words were the same. The results in this study, may be explained by Wegner's Ironic Process Theory (Wegner, 1994). Wegner argues that, in order to avoid certain thought contents, an individual needs to attend to those contents. For the restrained eater this might mean that she first shifts attention towards the food words in the dot probe task in order to subsequently avoid them, which might explain the sro net effect. Indirect support for the idea that restrained eaters needed to attend the food words in order to avoid them, is found in the results of the recognition task: restrained subjects needed less time to recognize food stimuli than neutral stimuli. John Wiley
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-1
JournalEuropean Eating Disorders Review
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Cite this

@article{9241208fe2404f10be0e1f122fcd4566,
title = "Do Restrained Eaters Show Attention Toward or Away From Food, Shape and Weight Stimuli?",
abstract = "The Present study was designed to examine whether the frequently found prolonged colour naming of food words in Stroop, tasks in people who restrain their food intake is due to hyperattention to or avoidance of these food words. MacLeod's visual attention (or dot probe) paradigm (MacLeod et al., 1986) was used, as well as a word recognition task. Food, weight/shape and neutral words were presented. Fifty-nine women, classified as restrained or unrestrained eaters, participated in both tasks. The visual attention task revealed neither attention nor avoidance of food and weight/ shape stimuli. In the recognition task, however, restrained subjects were found to need less time for recognizing food words than neutral words. For unrestrained eaters, the response times for food and neutral words were the same. The results in this study, may be explained by Wegner's Ironic Process Theory (Wegner, 1994). Wegner argues that, in order to avoid certain thought contents, an individual needs to attend to those contents. For the restrained eater this might mean that she first shifts attention towards the food words in the dot probe task in order to subsequently avoid them, which might explain the sro net effect. Indirect support for the idea that restrained eaters needed to attend the food words in order to avoid them, is found in the results of the recognition task: restrained subjects needed less time to recognize food stimuli than neutral stimuli. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.",
author = "B.J.F. Boon and L. Vogelzang and A.T.M. Jansen",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(200002)8:1<51::AID-ERV306>3.0.CO;2-E",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "8--1",
journal = "European Eating Disorders Review",
issn = "1072-4133",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

Do Restrained Eaters Show Attention Toward or Away From Food, Shape and Weight Stimuli? / Boon, B.J.F.; Vogelzang, L.; Jansen, A.T.M.

In: European Eating Disorders Review, Vol. 8, 01.01.2000, p. 8-1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Restrained Eaters Show Attention Toward or Away From Food, Shape and Weight Stimuli?

AU - Boon, B.J.F.

AU - Vogelzang, L.

AU - Jansen, A.T.M.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The Present study was designed to examine whether the frequently found prolonged colour naming of food words in Stroop, tasks in people who restrain their food intake is due to hyperattention to or avoidance of these food words. MacLeod's visual attention (or dot probe) paradigm (MacLeod et al., 1986) was used, as well as a word recognition task. Food, weight/shape and neutral words were presented. Fifty-nine women, classified as restrained or unrestrained eaters, participated in both tasks. The visual attention task revealed neither attention nor avoidance of food and weight/ shape stimuli. In the recognition task, however, restrained subjects were found to need less time for recognizing food words than neutral words. For unrestrained eaters, the response times for food and neutral words were the same. The results in this study, may be explained by Wegner's Ironic Process Theory (Wegner, 1994). Wegner argues that, in order to avoid certain thought contents, an individual needs to attend to those contents. For the restrained eater this might mean that she first shifts attention towards the food words in the dot probe task in order to subsequently avoid them, which might explain the sro net effect. Indirect support for the idea that restrained eaters needed to attend the food words in order to avoid them, is found in the results of the recognition task: restrained subjects needed less time to recognize food stimuli than neutral stimuli. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

AB - The Present study was designed to examine whether the frequently found prolonged colour naming of food words in Stroop, tasks in people who restrain their food intake is due to hyperattention to or avoidance of these food words. MacLeod's visual attention (or dot probe) paradigm (MacLeod et al., 1986) was used, as well as a word recognition task. Food, weight/shape and neutral words were presented. Fifty-nine women, classified as restrained or unrestrained eaters, participated in both tasks. The visual attention task revealed neither attention nor avoidance of food and weight/ shape stimuli. In the recognition task, however, restrained subjects were found to need less time for recognizing food words than neutral words. For unrestrained eaters, the response times for food and neutral words were the same. The results in this study, may be explained by Wegner's Ironic Process Theory (Wegner, 1994). Wegner argues that, in order to avoid certain thought contents, an individual needs to attend to those contents. For the restrained eater this might mean that she first shifts attention towards the food words in the dot probe task in order to subsequently avoid them, which might explain the sro net effect. Indirect support for the idea that restrained eaters needed to attend the food words in order to avoid them, is found in the results of the recognition task: restrained subjects needed less time to recognize food stimuli than neutral stimuli. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(200002)8:1<51::AID-ERV306>3.0.CO;2-E

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(200002)8:1<51::AID-ERV306>3.0.CO;2-E

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 8

EP - 1

JO - European Eating Disorders Review

JF - European Eating Disorders Review

SN - 1072-4133

ER -