Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa.

Tobias Broich

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

This study is part of an emerging literature that aims to shed light on China's development finance activities in Africa using quantitative estimation techniques. This paper empirically investigates whether African authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development assistance than democratic ones, both in absolute and relative terms. I use three different measures of democracy/autocracy which allows me to check whether my results depend on the specific indicator chosen. The OLS results suggest that Chinese development finance does not systematically flow to more authoritarian countries, controlling for strategic, economic, political, institutional and geographic confounding factors. The results are not driven by the specific democracy indicator used in the analysis. The findings remain virtually unchanged if I reduce the sample to Sub-Saharan Africa only. Furthermore, the results stand up to several robustness checks, including FE, RE and instrumental variable estimation
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUNU-MERIT working papers
Volume2017
Edition011
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2017

JEL classifications

  • f35 - Foreign Aid
  • h10 - Structure and Scope of Government: General
  • o11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
  • o55 - Economywide Country Studies: Africa

Keywords

  • Development Finance
  • Foreign Aid
  • China
  • Africa
  • Autocracy
  • Democracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this