Diversity matters: the other doctor within the Dutch academic healthcare system

T.T.T. Tweed*, C.V. Maduro, N.H. Gunes, M. Poeze, J.O. Busari

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review


Introduction Over the past year, there has been a worldwide increase in the focus on systemic discrimination and inequitable practices within different societies, particularly concerning race and ethnicity. The inherent (experience of) inequity in racism is notonly limited to individuals but also found in different domains of societal structures, including healthcare and academia. In academia and healthcare organisations, junior Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) doctors and students regularly find themselves caught between the leaky pipeline phenomenon and hierarchically dependent positions in academic healthcare settings. Voicing their experiences after such encounters is neither an option nor a choice they can do without repercussions. The prejudices, stigmas, implicit biases present within these environments result in segregated practices, where BAME doctors become the 'other' doctor (otherism), and based on their religion, ethnicity, migrant background or physical features are boxed into a specific group or category.Reflections & recommendations The outcome of this exercise (re-) emphasised that more improvement in the Dutch healthcare systems concerning stigmas and biases towards race and ethnicity are needed to promote the inclusion of future BAME doctors and students. A pivotal turn is urgently needed to repair the racial stigmas and biases that have distorted the image of BAME doctors/students, limiting their academic and professional progress. By structurally implementing focused strategies to promote inclusivity, the current gap within healthcare and the participation between non- BAME and BAME-doctors/students can be bridged, inevitably leading to better healthcare services, safer learning environments and a balanced representation of our multicultural societies in healthcare. We argue that increased self-reflection from such critical inquiry will ultimately result in clear and objective understandings of (pre) existent inequitable practices in our societies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-174
Number of pages4
JournalBMJ Leader
Issue number3
Early online date26 Sept 2021
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022


  • clinical leadership
  • health system
  • improvement
  • medical leadership


Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity matters: the other doctor within the Dutch academic healthcare system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this