Abstract
For more than 30 years, the posttraumatic model (PTM) and the sociocognitive model (SCM) of dissociation have vied for attention and empirical support. We contend that neither perspective provides a satisfactory account and that dissociation and dissociative disorders (e.g., depersonalization/derealization disorder, dissociative identity disorder) can be understood as failures of normally adaptive systems and functions. We argue for a more encompassing transdiagnostic and transtheoretical perspective that considers potentially interactive variables including sleep disturbances; impaired self-regulation and inhibition of negative cognitions and affects; hyperassociation and set shifts; and deficits in reality testing, source attributions, and metacognition. We present an overview of the field of dissociation, delineate uncontested and converging claims across perspectives, summarize key multivariable studies in support of our framework, and identify empirical pathways for future research to advance our understanding of dissociation, including studies of highly adverse events and dissociation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 18 is May 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 259-289 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Annual Review of Clinical Psychology |
Volume | 18 |
Early online date | 28 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2022 |
Keywords
- dissociation
- dissociative disorders
- posttraumatic model of dissociation
- sociocognitive model of dissociation
- depersonalization/derealization disorder
- dissociative identity disorder
- POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
- MULTIPLE PERSONALITY-DISORDER
- SLEEP-RELATED EXPERIENCES
- IDENTITY DISORDER
- CHILDHOOD TRAUMA
- PATHOLOGICAL DISSOCIATION
- COGNITIVE INHIBITION
- STATE DISSOCIATION
- UNIFIED PROTOCOL
- SELF-REPORTS