Dissociation and dissociative disorders: challenging conventional wisdom

S.J. Lynn, S.O. Lilienfeld, H. Merckelbach, T. Giesbrecht, D. van der Kloet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that dissociation is a coping mechanism triggered by exposure to intense stressors. Drawing on recent research from multiple laboratories, we challenge this prevailing posttraumatic model of dissociation and dissociative disorders. Proponents of this model hold that dissociation and dissociative disorders are associated with (a) intense objective stressors (e. g., childhood trauma), (b) serious cognitive deficits that impede processing of emotionally laden information, and (c) an avoidant information-processing style characterized by a tendency to forget painful memories. We review findings that contradict these widely accepted assumptions and argue that a sociocognitive model better accounts for the extant data. We further propose a perspective on dissociation based on a recently established link between a labile sleep-wake cycle and memory errors, cognitive failures, problems in attentional control, and difficulties in distinguishing fantasy from reality. We conclude that this perspective may help to reconcile the posttraumatic and sociocognitive models of dissociation and dissociative disorders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-53
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Cite this

@article{7a672c17b3174a2d8cd197e1a4733c50,
title = "Dissociation and dissociative disorders: challenging conventional wisdom",
abstract = "Conventional wisdom holds that dissociation is a coping mechanism triggered by exposure to intense stressors. Drawing on recent research from multiple laboratories, we challenge this prevailing posttraumatic model of dissociation and dissociative disorders. Proponents of this model hold that dissociation and dissociative disorders are associated with (a) intense objective stressors (e. g., childhood trauma), (b) serious cognitive deficits that impede processing of emotionally laden information, and (c) an avoidant information-processing style characterized by a tendency to forget painful memories. We review findings that contradict these widely accepted assumptions and argue that a sociocognitive model better accounts for the extant data. We further propose a perspective on dissociation based on a recently established link between a labile sleep-wake cycle and memory errors, cognitive failures, problems in attentional control, and difficulties in distinguishing fantasy from reality. We conclude that this perspective may help to reconcile the posttraumatic and sociocognitive models of dissociation and dissociative disorders.",
author = "S.J. Lynn and S.O. Lilienfeld and H. Merckelbach and T. Giesbrecht and {van der Kloet}, D.",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0963721411429457",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "48--53",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Dissociation and dissociative disorders: challenging conventional wisdom. / Lynn, S.J.; Lilienfeld, S.O.; Merckelbach, H.; Giesbrecht, T.; van der Kloet, D.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 48-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dissociation and dissociative disorders: challenging conventional wisdom

AU - Lynn, S.J.

AU - Lilienfeld, S.O.

AU - Merckelbach, H.

AU - Giesbrecht, T.

AU - van der Kloet, D.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Conventional wisdom holds that dissociation is a coping mechanism triggered by exposure to intense stressors. Drawing on recent research from multiple laboratories, we challenge this prevailing posttraumatic model of dissociation and dissociative disorders. Proponents of this model hold that dissociation and dissociative disorders are associated with (a) intense objective stressors (e. g., childhood trauma), (b) serious cognitive deficits that impede processing of emotionally laden information, and (c) an avoidant information-processing style characterized by a tendency to forget painful memories. We review findings that contradict these widely accepted assumptions and argue that a sociocognitive model better accounts for the extant data. We further propose a perspective on dissociation based on a recently established link between a labile sleep-wake cycle and memory errors, cognitive failures, problems in attentional control, and difficulties in distinguishing fantasy from reality. We conclude that this perspective may help to reconcile the posttraumatic and sociocognitive models of dissociation and dissociative disorders.

AB - Conventional wisdom holds that dissociation is a coping mechanism triggered by exposure to intense stressors. Drawing on recent research from multiple laboratories, we challenge this prevailing posttraumatic model of dissociation and dissociative disorders. Proponents of this model hold that dissociation and dissociative disorders are associated with (a) intense objective stressors (e. g., childhood trauma), (b) serious cognitive deficits that impede processing of emotionally laden information, and (c) an avoidant information-processing style characterized by a tendency to forget painful memories. We review findings that contradict these widely accepted assumptions and argue that a sociocognitive model better accounts for the extant data. We further propose a perspective on dissociation based on a recently established link between a labile sleep-wake cycle and memory errors, cognitive failures, problems in attentional control, and difficulties in distinguishing fantasy from reality. We conclude that this perspective may help to reconcile the posttraumatic and sociocognitive models of dissociation and dissociative disorders.

U2 - 10.1177/0963721411429457

DO - 10.1177/0963721411429457

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 48

EP - 53

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 1

ER -