Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football

Karol Kempa*, Hannes Rusch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from european football. We extend previous studies by differentiating between dissents with the referee and misconducts directly aimed at sabotaging the competitor. We find that sabotage is more likely committed by teams with lower ability. Dissent is more likely to be shown by teams lagging behind in score and by away teams. We further find that captains engage more in sabotage during important matches and challenge referees' decisions immediately after sanctions of teammates. Finally, we also observe a deterrence effect of sanctions on all types of misconduct.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-514
Number of pages15
JournalManagerial and Decision Economics
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • TEAM ATTRIBUTIONS
  • TOURNAMENTS
  • ENGLISH
  • SPORT
  • PERFORMANCE
  • FAVORITISM
  • INCENTIVES
  • REFEREES
  • INCONSISTENT
  • SELECTION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this