Discriminant value of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family physicians encounter many pitfalls in managing and treating dyspeptic patients, most of whom are treated in family practice based solely on their signs and symptoms.

METHODS: A computer literature search followed by a systematic methodological appraisal was performed to identify studies that evaluated clinical symptomatology in dyspeptic patients.

RESULTS: Ten studies, none of which took place in a family practice, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main conclusion drawn from outpatient populations and patients referred for open-access endoscopy was that certain clusters of symptoms have a negative predictive value for organic causes of dyspepsia. Higher age, male sex, pain at night, relief by antacids or food, and previous history of peptic ulcer disease were identified as predictors of organic causes for abdominal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings can be helpful to family physicians in determining the need for endoscopy referral. However, since the diagnostic values of tests in family practice may differ from those in referred populations, there is a need for prospective studies in primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-143
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume38
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1994

Keywords

  • Dyspepsia/diagnosis
  • Family Practice
  • Gastroscopy
  • Humans
  • Predictive Value of Tests

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discriminant value of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this