Differentiated CaCo-2 cells as an in-vitro model to evaluate de-novo apolipoprotein A-I production in the small intestine

S.P. Dullens, R.P. Mensink, E.C. Mariman, J. Plat*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


    BACKGROUND: Increasing HDL cholesterol concentrations by stimulating de-novo apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) production in the liver and/or in the small intestine is a potential strategy to reduce coronary heart disease risk. Although there is quite some knowledge concerning regulatory effects in the liver, less is known concerning potential agents that could elevate de-novo apoA-I production in the small intestine. METHODS: Therefore, we compared side-by-side effects of various peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, PPARgamma, retinoid-X-receptor alpha, and farnesoid-X-receptor agonists on de-novo apoA-I production in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells. RESULTS: For PPARa agonists, we showed that GW7647 elevated apoA-I concentrations in the medium of both cell models, whereas WY14643 elevated only de-novo apoA-I concentrations in differentiated CaCo-2 cells. Unexpectedly, fenofibric acid lowered apoA-I medium concentrations in both cell lines, which could not be explained by a lack of PPAR transactivation or a lack of retinoid-X-receptor a activation. For farnesoid-X-receptor agonists, chenodeoxycholic acid strongly reduced apoA-I concentrations both in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells, whereas GW4064 and taurocholate only lowered apoA-I in CaCo-2 cells (GW4064) or in HepG2 cells (taurocholate). However, overall effects of all individual components on apoA-I production in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells were highly correlated (r = 0.68; P = 0.037; N=9). CONCLUSION: We conclude that differentiated CaCo-2 cells are suitable models to study de-novo small intestinal apoA-I production in vitro enabling the possibility to screen for potential bioactive dietary components. This cell model may also determine small-intestinal-specific effects, as some discrepancy was found between both cell models.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)642-9
    JournalEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

    Cite this