Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations: Results from the Maastricht Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

532 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations were examined among 8521 employees participating in the Maastricht Cohort Study of "Fatigue at Work." Additional information on the perceived psychosocial work environment was incorporated. A total of 131 occupations, classified according to the Netherlands Standard Classification of Occupations 1992, were studied. Results showed that occupation as a proxy index of the "objective" work environment adds little explanatory information beyond perceived measures of the work environment. Although "occupation" seems to be an easy entree for intervention, focusing on occupation exclusively to prevent, or at least reduce, fatigue and psychological distress may be inadequate. Supplementary information about the perceived work environment of the job occupant is needed to develop preventive measures on the individual level. Further research, including a longitudinal analysis, is required to elucidate the complex relation between occupation, psychosocial risk factors, and fatigue and psychological distress.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)976-983
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2001

Keywords

  • Minor psychiatric-disorder
  • Stress
  • Epidemiology
  • Population
  • Validity
  • Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations: Results from the Maastricht Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this