Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Dietary Restraint Fallacy
Anita Jansen
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Eating Disorders and Addiction
Section Eating Disorders and Obesity
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Editorial
›
Academic
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary Restraint Fallacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Dietary Restraint
100%
Fallacies
100%
Eating Disorders
66%
Caloric Restriction
33%
Eating Disorder Symptoms
33%
Randomized Controlled Trial
16%
Obesity
16%
International Journals
16%
Weight Loss
16%
Reward Sensitivity
16%
Cognitive Processes
16%
Eating
16%
Overeating
16%
Causal Link
16%
Weight Gain
16%
Binge Eating
16%
Caloric Intake
16%
Food Cue Reactivity
16%
Misinterpretation
16%
Binge
16%
Laboratory Research
16%
Food Cans
16%
Reverse Causality
16%
Conceptual Issues
16%
Executive Skills
16%
Eating Control
16%
Randomized Controlled Experiment
16%
Ultra-processed Foods
16%
Weight Disorders
16%
INIS
restraints
100%
food
66%
weight
50%
symptoms
33%
laboratories
16%
reactivity
16%
sensitivity
16%
intake
16%
control
16%
recommendations
16%
gain
16%
losses
16%
reflection
16%
obesity
16%
causality
16%
Medicine and Dentistry
Dietary Restraint
100%
Eating Disorder
66%
Caloric Restriction
33%
Randomized Controlled Trial
16%
Caloric Intake
16%
Observational Study
16%
Overnutrition
16%
Disease
16%
Cue Reactivity
16%
Binge Eating
16%
Treatment of Eating Disorders
16%
Food Science
Dietary Restraint
100%
Calorie Restriction
33%
Processed Food
16%
Whole Food
16%
Calorie
16%
Psychology
Eating Disorder
100%
Cognitive Process
25%
Weight Gain
25%
Treatment of Eating Disorders
25%
Neuroscience
Eating Disorder
100%
Randomized Controlled Trial
25%
Cognitive Process
25%
Treatment of Eating Disorders
25%