This paper gives a formal elaboration of the theory of legal reasoning and argumentation that was described in Hage et al. 1994. Legal reasoning is considered to be procedural, and the way this procedure is modeled is a two person dialogue. Basic elements of this two person dialogue are defined, such as moves, and rules are formulated that describe how dialogues run. Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, New York, pp. 146-155.
|Title of host publication||ICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law|
|Place of Publication||Neew York|
|Publisher||Association for Computing Machinery|
|Number of pages||1|
|Publication status||Published - May 1995|
Lodder, A. R., & Herczog, A. (1995). DiaLaw: A dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning. In ICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (pp. 146–155). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222225