DiaLaw: A dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning

A.R. Lodder, A. Herczog

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper gives a formal elaboration of the theory of legal reasoning and argumentation that was described in Hage et al. 1994. Legal reasoning is considered to be procedural, and the way this procedure is modeled is a two person dialogue. Basic elements of this two person dialogue are defined, such as moves, and rules are formulated that describe how dialogues run. Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, New York, pp. 146-155.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Place of PublicationNeew York
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages146–155
Number of pages1
ISBN (Print)978-0-89791-758-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1995
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Lodder, A. R., & Herczog, A. (1995). DiaLaw: A dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning. In ICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (pp. 146–155). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222225