Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.

Methods: PubMed and the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation database were searched for English-language publications related to economic evaluations on diagnostic technologies. Trial-based economic evaluations were assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Modeling studies were assessed using the framework for quality assessment of decision-analytic models.

Results: The search retrieved 2109 items, from which eight decision-analytic modeling studies and one trial-based economic evaluation met all eligibility criteria.

Conclusions: Diversity among the study objective and characteristics was considerable and, despite considerable methodological quality, several flaws were indicated. Recommendations were focused on diagnostic aspects and the applicability of existing models for the evaluation of recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-237
Number of pages13
JournalAlzheimer's & Dementia
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Neurodegenerative disorder
  • Dementia
  • Early diagnosis
  • Diagnostic intervention
  • Biomarker
  • Economic evaluation
  • Health technology assessment
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Costs
  • Modeling
  • Decision-analytic model
  • Quality assessment
  • Review
  • HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT
  • DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS
  • NATIONAL INSTITUTE
  • GUIDELINES
  • DEMENTIA
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • QUALITY
  • MILD

Cite this

@article{1807d888757c4fa4903a68932dc1e6b0,
title = "Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of economic evaluations",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.Methods: PubMed and the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation database were searched for English-language publications related to economic evaluations on diagnostic technologies. Trial-based economic evaluations were assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Modeling studies were assessed using the framework for quality assessment of decision-analytic models.Results: The search retrieved 2109 items, from which eight decision-analytic modeling studies and one trial-based economic evaluation met all eligibility criteria.Conclusions: Diversity among the study objective and characteristics was considerable and, despite considerable methodological quality, several flaws were indicated. Recommendations were focused on diagnostic aspects and the applicability of existing models for the evaluation of recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Neurodegenerative disorder, Dementia, Early diagnosis, Diagnostic intervention, Biomarker, Economic evaluation, Health technology assessment, Cost-effectiveness, Costs, Modeling, Decision-analytic model, Quality assessment, Review, HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT, DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION, COST-EFFECTIVENESS, ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS, NATIONAL INSTITUTE, GUIDELINES, DEMENTIA, RECOMMENDATIONS, QUALITY, MILD",
author = "R.L.H. Handels and C.A.G. Wolfs and P. Aalten and M. Joore and F.R.J. Verhey and J.L. Severens",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "225--237",
journal = "Alzheimer's & Dementia",
issn = "1552-5260",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "2",

}

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of economic evaluations. / Handels, R.L.H.; Wolfs, C.A.G.; Aalten, P.; Joore, M.; Verhey, F.R.J.; Severens, J.L.

In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Vol. 10, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 225-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of economic evaluations

AU - Handels, R.L.H.

AU - Wolfs, C.A.G.

AU - Aalten, P.

AU - Joore, M.

AU - Verhey, F.R.J.

AU - Severens, J.L.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Background: The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.Methods: PubMed and the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation database were searched for English-language publications related to economic evaluations on diagnostic technologies. Trial-based economic evaluations were assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Modeling studies were assessed using the framework for quality assessment of decision-analytic models.Results: The search retrieved 2109 items, from which eight decision-analytic modeling studies and one trial-based economic evaluation met all eligibility criteria.Conclusions: Diversity among the study objective and characteristics was considerable and, despite considerable methodological quality, several flaws were indicated. Recommendations were focused on diagnostic aspects and the applicability of existing models for the evaluation of recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

AB - Background: The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.Methods: PubMed and the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation database were searched for English-language publications related to economic evaluations on diagnostic technologies. Trial-based economic evaluations were assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Modeling studies were assessed using the framework for quality assessment of decision-analytic models.Results: The search retrieved 2109 items, from which eight decision-analytic modeling studies and one trial-based economic evaluation met all eligibility criteria.Conclusions: Diversity among the study objective and characteristics was considerable and, despite considerable methodological quality, several flaws were indicated. Recommendations were focused on diagnostic aspects and the applicability of existing models for the evaluation of recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Neurodegenerative disorder

KW - Dementia

KW - Early diagnosis

KW - Diagnostic intervention

KW - Biomarker

KW - Economic evaluation

KW - Health technology assessment

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Costs

KW - Modeling

KW - Decision-analytic model

KW - Quality assessment

KW - Review

KW - HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT

KW - DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION

KW - COST-EFFECTIVENESS

KW - ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS

KW - NATIONAL INSTITUTE

KW - GUIDELINES

KW - DEMENTIA

KW - RECOMMENDATIONS

KW - QUALITY

KW - MILD

U2 - 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 225

EP - 237

JO - Alzheimer's & Dementia

JF - Alzheimer's & Dementia

SN - 1552-5260

IS - 2

ER -