Abstract
Device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF), like clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), is also associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, although the risk appears to be significantly lower. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in DDAF were investigated in two large randomized trials (NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA [13, 19]). They showed a low rate of ischemic strokes without anticoagulation (about 1% per year). This risk can still be reduced by therapeutic anticoagulation, but the risk of severe bleeding increases. In the recently published position paper [36] of the German Society of Cardiology, the current study situation was presented and expert recommendations were given on how to deal with DDAF.
| Translated title of the contribution | What to do with device-detected atrial fibrillation?: Executive summary of the position paper of the German Society of Cardiology |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 49-56 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 1 Jan 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- Anticoagulation
- Atrial fibrillation
- Heart and brain
- ICD
- Pacemaker
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What to do with device-detected atrial fibrillation? Executive summary of the position paper of the German Society of Cardiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver