Developmental immunotoxicity in male rats after juvenile exposure to di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTC)

Elisa C. M. Tonk*, Aart Verhoef, Liset J de la Fonteyne-Blankestijn, Ine D. H. Waalkens-Berendsen, Andre P. M. Wolterbeek, Henk van Loveren, Aldert H. Piersma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To determine relevant endpoints for evaluating developmental immunotoxicity due to juvenile exposure and optimal age of the animals at assessment, a wide range of immunological parameters were assessed in a juvenile toxicity study. Rats were exposed to di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTC) by gavage from postnatal day (PND) 10 through PND 21 and via the diet after weaning using a benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Immune assessments were performed in male rats on PNDs 21, 42, and 70 and a subset of animals was used to evaluate the T-cell dependent antibody response (TDAR) to Keyhole limpet hemocyanin. Immune effects were more pronounced on PND 21 and 42 and observed at lower doses than developmental effects. The most sensitive immune parameters affected included TDAR parameters and thymocyte subpopulations with lower confidence limits of the benchmark doses (BMDLs) below the overall no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for DOTC reported so far in literature. These findings illustrate the relative sensitivity of the developing immune system for DOTC, the additional value of assessing functional immune parameters, and underscore the relevance of juvenile immunotoxicity testing in view of the risk assessment of chemicals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-348
JournalReproductive Toxicology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Keywords

  • Developmental immunotoxicity
  • Organotin
  • Juvenile toxicity
  • Rat
  • Benchmark dose approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental immunotoxicity in male rats after juvenile exposure to di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTC)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this