Abstract
Decision-making in healthcare often relies on narrative guidelines; however, these instruments are poorly accessible for supporting clinical decision-making. This study explores the application of rule-based decision logic in algorithmic modeling, emphasizing its great potential in clinical decision support and research. Integrating rule-based algorithms with existing information systems and real-world data poses a serious challenge. Integrating decision algorithms with information standards increases their effectiveness across various applications. This study outlines a method for constructing clinical decision trees (CDTs), highlighting their transparency and interpretability, using information standards as a design principle. We use the digitization of the Dutch breast cancer guideline through CDTs as a case study to exemplify their versatility and practical significance. The process step 'primary treatment' has been successfully translated from the narrative guidelines format to the anticipated ted computational format.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1348-1352 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |
| Volume | 316 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- Clinical Decision Trees
- Computer interpretable
- Guidelines
- Knowledge Representation
- Recommendations
- Algorithms
- Decision Support Systems, Clinical
- Humans
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Medical Oncology
- Decision Trees
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Female
- Netherlands