Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging

  • Ruud G. P. M. van Stiphout*
  • , Guido Lammering
  • , Jeroen Buijsen
  • , Marco N. M. Janssen
  • , Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
  • , Pieter Slagmolen
  • , Maarten Lambrecht
  • , Domenico Rubello
  • , Marcello Gava
  • , Alessandro Giordano
  • , Eric O. Postma
  • , Karin Haustermans
  • , Carlo Capirci
  • , Vincenzo Valentini
  • , Philippe Lambin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate an accurate predictive model and a nomogram for pathologic complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data. Accurate prediction could enable more individualised surgical approaches, including less extensive resection or even a wait-and-see policy. Methods and materials: Population based databases from 953 patients were collected from four different institutes and divided into three groups: clinical factors (training: 677 patients, validation: 85 patients), pre-CRT PET-CT (training: 114 patients, validation: 37 patients) and post-CRT PET-CT (training: 107 patients, validation: 55 patients). A pCR was defined as ypT0N0 reported by pathology after surgery. The data were analysed using a linear multivariate classification model (support vector machine), and the model's performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The occurrence rate of pCR in the datasets was between 15% and 31%. The model based on clinical variables (AUC(train) = 0.61 +/- 0.03, AUC(validation) = 0.69 +/- 0.08) resulted in the following predictors: cT- and cN-stage and tumour length. Addition of pre-CRT PET data did not result in a significantly higher performance (AUC(train) = 0.68 +/- 0.08, AUC(validation) = 0.68 +/- 0.10) and revealed maximal radioactive isotope uptake (SUV(max)) and tumour location as extra predictors. The best model achieved was based on the addition of post-CRT PET-data (AUC(train) = 0.83 +/- 0.05, AUC(validation) = 0.86 +/- 0.05) and included the following predictors: tumour length, post-CRT SUV(max) and relative change of SUV(max). This model performed significantly better than the clinical model (p(train) <0.001, p(validation) = 0.056). Conclusions: The model and the nomogram developed based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data can accurately predict pCR, and can be used as a decision support tool for surgery after prospective validation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-133
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Response prediction
  • PET imaging
  • Machine learning
  • Rectal cancer
  • External validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this