TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing digital educational materials for nursing and sustainability: The results of an observational study
AU - Alvarez-Nieto, Carmen
AU - Richardson, Janet
AU - Parra-Anguita, Gema
AU - Linares-Abad, Manuel
AU - Huss, Norma
AU - Grande-Gascon, M.
AU - Grose, Jane
AU - Huynen, Maud
AU - Lopez-Medina, Isabel M.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: There is limited European literature on nursing and sustainability; nursing students are poorly prepared on the connections between resources, climate change, sustainability, and health, so they must acquire knowledge and develop skills and competencies in this field. The use of digital technologies and teaching via E-learning has grown, and has been widely adopted as a learning method for nursing. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to test and evaluate digital educational materials on environmental sustainability and health, in the context of university nursing education in different European countries. Design: An observational cross-sectional design. Settings: University of Plymouth, University of Jaen, and University of Esslingen for Nursing Degree Studies. Participants: 299 nursing students: 161 students from University of Jaen; 106 from Plymouth; and 32 from Esslingen. 22 professional evaluators with different profiles were recruited: Teachers, Clinical professionals, Delphi Experts, and Technical Experts. Methods: We conducted a piloting and validation process. The materials were designed and adapted to the NurSusTOOLKIT Sustainability Literacy and Competency framework. Evaluation was developed by professionals and students. We used the Spanish Standard for the assessment of Digital Educational Material Quality at University level questionnaire. All students provided informed consent prior to taking part in the learning and evaluation. Results: The overall evaluations of materials by students and professionals were 7.98 +/- 1.28 and 8.50 +/- 1.17, respectively. The Ability to generate learning was scored higher among students (mean difference: 0.84; 0.22-1.47; p = 0.008). In the overall assessment by students, statistically significant differences were found between the three universities (Welch: 11.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Students, professionals, and technical experts considered the materials to be very good quality, especially regarding the quality of contents, format, and design. For students, these materials can generate reflection and learning regarding environmental and health issues during nursing training.
AB - Background: There is limited European literature on nursing and sustainability; nursing students are poorly prepared on the connections between resources, climate change, sustainability, and health, so they must acquire knowledge and develop skills and competencies in this field. The use of digital technologies and teaching via E-learning has grown, and has been widely adopted as a learning method for nursing. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to test and evaluate digital educational materials on environmental sustainability and health, in the context of university nursing education in different European countries. Design: An observational cross-sectional design. Settings: University of Plymouth, University of Jaen, and University of Esslingen for Nursing Degree Studies. Participants: 299 nursing students: 161 students from University of Jaen; 106 from Plymouth; and 32 from Esslingen. 22 professional evaluators with different profiles were recruited: Teachers, Clinical professionals, Delphi Experts, and Technical Experts. Methods: We conducted a piloting and validation process. The materials were designed and adapted to the NurSusTOOLKIT Sustainability Literacy and Competency framework. Evaluation was developed by professionals and students. We used the Spanish Standard for the assessment of Digital Educational Material Quality at University level questionnaire. All students provided informed consent prior to taking part in the learning and evaluation. Results: The overall evaluations of materials by students and professionals were 7.98 +/- 1.28 and 8.50 +/- 1.17, respectively. The Ability to generate learning was scored higher among students (mean difference: 0.84; 0.22-1.47; p = 0.008). In the overall assessment by students, statistically significant differences were found between the three universities (Welch: 11.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Students, professionals, and technical experts considered the materials to be very good quality, especially regarding the quality of contents, format, and design. For students, these materials can generate reflection and learning regarding environmental and health issues during nursing training.
KW - Nursing education
KW - Nursing students
KW - Teaching materials
KW - e-Learning
KW - Web-based learning
KW - Environmental health
KW - Environmental sustainability
KW - Climate change
KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE
KW - CURRICULUM
KW - QUALITY
KW - HEALTH
KW - FRAMEWORK
KW - STUDENTS
KW - NEED
U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 29121552
SN - 0260-6917
VL - 60
SP - 139
EP - 146
JO - Nurse Education Today
JF - Nurse Education Today
ER -