Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Detection, Treatment, and Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence in the Netherlands A Nationwide Analysis

  • L.A. Daamen*
  • , V.P. Groot
  • , M.G. Besselink
  • , K. Bosscha
  • , O.R. Busch
  • , G.A. Cirkel
  • , R.M. van Dam
  • , S. Festen
  • , B.G. Koerkamp
  • , N.H. Mohammad
  • , E. van der Harst
  • , I.H.J.T. de Hingh
  • , M.P.W. Intven
  • , G. Kazemier
  • , M. Los
  • , G.J. Meijer
  • , V.E. de Meijer
  • , V.B. Nieuwenhuijs
  • , B.K. Pranger
  • , M.G. Raicu
  • J.M.J. Schreinemakers, M.W.J. Stommel, R.C. Verdonk, H.M. Verkooijen, I.Q. Molenaar, H.C. van Santvoort*, Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether detection of recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in an early, asymptomatic stage increases the number of patients receiving additional treatment, subsequently improving survival. Summary of Background data: International guidelines disagree on the value of standardized postoperative surveillance for early detection and treatment of PDAC recurrence. Methods: A nationwide, observational cohort study was performed including all patients who underwent PDAC resection (2014-2016). Prospective baseline and perioperative data were retrieved from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Data on follow-up, treatment, and survival were collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis, before and after propensity-score matching, stratified for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrence. Results: Eight hundred thirty-six patients with a median follow-up of 37 months (interquartile range 30-48) were analyzed. Of those, 670 patients (80%) developed PDAC recurrence after a median follow-up of 10 months (interquartile range 5-17). Additional treatment was performed in 159/511 patients (31%) with symptomatic recurrence versus 77/159 (48%) asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001). After propensity-score matching on lymph node ratio, adjuvant therapy, disease-free survival, and recurrence site, additional treatment was independently associated with improved OS for both symptomatic patients [hazard ratio 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.42-0.67); P < 0.001] and asymptomatic patients [hazard ratio 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.29-0.70); P < 0.001]. Conclusions: Additional treatment of PDAC recurrence was independently associated with improved OS, with asymptomatic patients having a higher probability to receive recurrence treatment. Therefore, standardized postoperative surveillance aiming to detect PDAC recurrence before the onset of symptoms has the potential to improve survival. This provides a rationale for prospective studies on standardized surveillance after PDAC resection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-775
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume275
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • ASSOCIATION
  • DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
  • FOLFIRINOX
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • GEMCITABINE
  • GUIDELINES
  • ISOLATED LOCAL RECURRENCE
  • PDAC
  • RESECTION
  • SURVEILLANCE
  • THERAPY
  • disease recurrence
  • follow-up
  • pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection, Treatment, and Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence in the Netherlands A Nationwide Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this