Detection of feigned crime-related amnesia: A multi-method approach

P. Giger, T. Merten, H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, M. Oswald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Claims of crime-related amnesia appear to be common. Using a mock crime approach, the diagnostic power of seven symptom validity instruments was investigated. Sixty participants were assigned to three conditions: responding honestly; feigning crime-related amnesia; feigning amnesia with a warning not to exaggerate. High sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test, and the Morel Emotional Numbing Test. Only three warned malingerers went undetected. The results demonstrate that validated instruments exist to support forensic decision making about crime-related amnesia. Yet, warning may undermine their effectiveness, even when using a multi-method approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-463
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychology Practice
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • HEAD-INJURY
  • MALINGERED NEUROCOGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION
  • MMPI-2
  • POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
  • RESPONSE BIAS
  • SCALE
  • SYMPTOM VALIDITY TEST
  • TESTS
  • VALIDATION
  • WORD MEMORY TEST
  • coaching
  • crime-related amnesia
  • malingering
  • symptom overgeneralization
  • symptom validity testing

Cite this