Detecting frail, older adults and identifying their strengths: results of a mixed-methods study

Sarah Dury*, Eva Dierckx, Anne van der Vorst, Michael van der Elst, Bram Fret, Daan Duppen, Lieve Hoeyberghs, Ellen De Roeck, Deborah Lambotte, An-Sofie Smetcoren, Jos Schols, Gertrudis Kempen, G. A. Rixt Zijlstra, Jan De Lepeleire, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Dominique Verte, Nico De Witte, Tinie Kardol, Peter Paul De Deyn, Sebastiaan EngelborghsLiesbeth De Donder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: The debate on frailty in later life focuses primarily on deficits and their associations with adverse (health) outcomes. In addition to deficits, it may also be important to consider the abilities and resources of older adults. This study was designed to gain insights into the lived experiences of frailty among older adults to determine which strengths can balance the deficits that affect frailty. Methods: Data from 121 potentially frail community-dwelling older adults in Flemish-speaking Region of Belgium and Brussels were collected using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected using the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and numeric rating scales (NRS) for quality of life (QoL), care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Bivariate analyses, paired samples t-tests and means were performed. Qualitative data on experiences of frailty, frailty balance, QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery were collected using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were subjected to thematic content analysis. Results: The "no to mild frailty" group had higher QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery scores than the "severe frailty" group. Nevertheless, qualitative results indicate that, despite being classified as frail, many older adults experienced high levels of QoL, care and support, meaning in life, and mastery. Respondents mentioned multiple balancing factors for frailty, comprising individual-level circumstances (e.g., personality traits, coping strategies, resilience), environmental influences (e.g., caregivers, neighborhood, social participation), and macro-level features (e.g., health literacy, adequate financial compensation). Respondents also highlighted that life changes affected their frailty balance, including changes in health, finances, personal relationships, and living situation. Conclusion: The findings indicate that frailty among older individuals can be considered as a dynamic state and, regardless of frailty, balancing factors are important in maintaining a good QoL. The study investigated not only the deficits, but also the abilities, and resources of frail, older adults. Public policymakers and healthcare organizations are encouraged to include these abilities, supplementary or even complementary to the usual focus on deficits.
Original languageEnglish
Article number191
Number of pages13
JournalBMC Public Health
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2018


  • Frail elderly
  • Caregivers
  • Social participation
  • Health literacy
  • Independent living
  • Quality of life
  • Belgium
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • Residence characteristics
  • CARE
  • RISK
  • HOME
  • Humans
  • Frail Elderly/psychology
  • Male
  • Frailty/diagnosis
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Independent Living
  • Quality of Life
  • Aged
  • Qualitative Research

Cite this