TY - JOUR
T1 - Deriving an overall appearance domain score by applying bifactor IRT analysis to the BODY-Q appearance scales
AU - Geerards, Daan
AU - van den Berg, Lisa
AU - Pusic, Andrea L.
AU - Hoogbergen, Maarten M.
AU - Klassen, Anne F.
AU - van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
AU - Sidey-Gibbons, Chris J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The original BODY-Q field-test study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. The Catharina Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School provided a travel grant for the first author’s research fellowship at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Purpose With the BODY-Q, one can assess outcomes, such as satisfaction with appearance, in weight loss and body contouring patients using multiple scales. All scales can be used independently in any given combination or order. Currently, the BODY-Q cannot provide overall appearance scores across scales that measure a similar super-ordinate construct (i.e., overall appearance), which could improve the scales' usefulness as a benchmarking tool and improve the comprehensibility of patient feedback. We explored the possibility of establishing overall appearance scores, by applying a bifactor model to the BODY-Q appearance scales. Methods In a bifactor model, questionnaire items load onto both a primary specific factors and a general factor, such as satisfaction with appearance. The international BODY-Q validation patient sample (n = 734) was used to fit a bifactor model to the appearance domain. Factor loadings, fit indices, and correlation between bifactor appearance domain and satisfaction with body scale were assessed. Results All items loaded on the general factor of their corresponding domain. In the appearance domain, all items demonstrated adequate item fit to the model. All scales had satisfactory fit to the bifactor model (RMSEA 0.045, CFI 0.969, and TLI 0.964). The correlation between the appearance domain summary scores and satisfaction with body scale scores was found to be 0.77. Discussion We successfully applied a bifactor model to BODY-Q data with good item and model fit indices. With this method, we were able to produce reliable overall appearance scores which may improve the interpretability of the BODY-Q while increasing flexibility.
AB - Purpose With the BODY-Q, one can assess outcomes, such as satisfaction with appearance, in weight loss and body contouring patients using multiple scales. All scales can be used independently in any given combination or order. Currently, the BODY-Q cannot provide overall appearance scores across scales that measure a similar super-ordinate construct (i.e., overall appearance), which could improve the scales' usefulness as a benchmarking tool and improve the comprehensibility of patient feedback. We explored the possibility of establishing overall appearance scores, by applying a bifactor model to the BODY-Q appearance scales. Methods In a bifactor model, questionnaire items load onto both a primary specific factors and a general factor, such as satisfaction with appearance. The international BODY-Q validation patient sample (n = 734) was used to fit a bifactor model to the appearance domain. Factor loadings, fit indices, and correlation between bifactor appearance domain and satisfaction with body scale were assessed. Results All items loaded on the general factor of their corresponding domain. In the appearance domain, all items demonstrated adequate item fit to the model. All scales had satisfactory fit to the bifactor model (RMSEA 0.045, CFI 0.969, and TLI 0.964). The correlation between the appearance domain summary scores and satisfaction with body scale scores was found to be 0.77. Discussion We successfully applied a bifactor model to BODY-Q data with good item and model fit indices. With this method, we were able to produce reliable overall appearance scores which may improve the interpretability of the BODY-Q while increasing flexibility.
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Bifactor
KW - Item response theory
KW - BODY-Q
KW - Massive weight loss
KW - Obesity
KW - Body contouring
KW - Appearance
KW - FIT INDEXES
KW - ITEM
KW - MODEL
KW - OUTCOMES
KW - QUALITY
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-019-02366-8
DO - 10.1007/s11136-019-02366-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 31758485
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 29
SP - 1065
EP - 1072
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 4
ER -