TY - JOUR
T1 - Delayed TME Surgery in a Watch and Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
T2 - An Analysis of Hospital Costs and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes
AU - Meyer, Vincent M
AU - Meuzelaar, Richtje R
AU - Schoenaker, Ivonne J H
AU - de Groot, Jan-Willem B
AU - Reerink, Onne
AU - de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Wouter H
AU - Beets, Geerard L
AU - van Westreenen, Henderik L
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: A watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a valuable alternative for rectal resection. However, there are patients who will have residual tumor or regrowth during watch and wait. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and costs for patients who underwent delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. Settings: The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 2015 and May 2020, 622 new rectal cancer patients were seen, of whom 200 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ninety-four patients were included, 65 of whom underwent immediate surgery and 29 of whom required delayed surgery after an initial watch-and-wait approach. Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included 30-day postoperative morbidity rate, hospital costs. 2-year overall and disease-free survival. Results: There was no difference in length of stay (9 vs 8; p = 0.83), readmissions (27.6% vs 10.0%; p = 0.10), surgical re-interventions (15.0% vs 3.4%; p = 0.16), or stoma-free rate (52.6% vs 31.0%; p = 0.09) between immediate and delayed surgery groups. Hospital costs were similar in the delayed group (€11,913 vs €13,769; p = 0.89). Two-year overall survival (93% vs 100%; p = 0.23) and disease-free survival (78% vs 81%; p = 0.47) rates were comparable. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, follow-up time and retrospective design. Conclusion: Delayed surgery for regrowth in a watch-and-wait program or for persistent residual disease after a repeated assessment is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or a significant rise in costs compared to immediate total mesorectal excision. There also appears to be no evident compromise in oncological outcome. Repeated response assessment in patients with a near complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a useful approach to identify more patients who can benefit from a watch-and-wait strategy.
AB - Background: A watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a valuable alternative for rectal resection. However, there are patients who will have residual tumor or regrowth during watch and wait. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and costs for patients who underwent delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. Settings: The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 2015 and May 2020, 622 new rectal cancer patients were seen, of whom 200 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ninety-four patients were included, 65 of whom underwent immediate surgery and 29 of whom required delayed surgery after an initial watch-and-wait approach. Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included 30-day postoperative morbidity rate, hospital costs. 2-year overall and disease-free survival. Results: There was no difference in length of stay (9 vs 8; p = 0.83), readmissions (27.6% vs 10.0%; p = 0.10), surgical re-interventions (15.0% vs 3.4%; p = 0.16), or stoma-free rate (52.6% vs 31.0%; p = 0.09) between immediate and delayed surgery groups. Hospital costs were similar in the delayed group (€11,913 vs €13,769; p = 0.89). Two-year overall survival (93% vs 100%; p = 0.23) and disease-free survival (78% vs 81%; p = 0.47) rates were comparable. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, follow-up time and retrospective design. Conclusion: Delayed surgery for regrowth in a watch-and-wait program or for persistent residual disease after a repeated assessment is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or a significant rise in costs compared to immediate total mesorectal excision. There also appears to be no evident compromise in oncological outcome. Repeated response assessment in patients with a near complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a useful approach to identify more patients who can benefit from a watch-and-wait strategy.
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259
M3 - Article
C2 - 34856587
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 66
SP - 671
EP - 680
JO - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
IS - 5
ER -