Defibrillation testing is mandatory in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to confirm appropriate ventricular fibrillation detection

Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux*, Sylvain Ploux, Pierre Mondoly, Romain Eschalier, Marc Strik, Laura Houard, Bertrand Pierre, Samuel Buliard, Nicolas Klotz, Philippe Ritter, Michel Haissaguerre, Karim Mahfouz, Pierre Bordachar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remains a new technology requiring accurate assessment of the various aspects of its functioning. Isolated cases of delayed sensing of ventricular arrhythmia have been described. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess the quality of sensing during induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent induction of VF at the end of the S-ICD implantation. RESULTS VF induction was successful in 133 patients (97%). Mean time to first therapy was 16.2 +/- 3.1 seconds, with a substantial range from 12.5 to 27.0 seconds. Four different detection profiles were arbitrarily defined: (1) optimal detection (n = 39 [29%]); (2) undersensing with moderate prolongation of time to therapy (<18 seconds; n = 68 [51%]); (3) undersensing with significant prolongation of the time to therapy (>18 seconds; n = 19 [14%]); and (4) absence of therapy or prolonged time to therapy related to noise oversensing (n = 7 [6%]). In some of the patients in the last group, despite induction of VF the initial counter was never filled, the device did not charge the capacitors, and the shock was not delivered because of a sustained diagnosis of noise (n = 5). A manual shock by the device or an external shock had to be delivered to restore the sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated a marked sensing delay leading to prolonged time to therapy in a large number of S-ICD patients. A few worrisome cases of noise oversensing inhibiting the therapies were detected. These results support the need for systematic intraoperative defibrillation testing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-650
Number of pages9
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Defibrillation testing
  • Noise
  • Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Undersensing
  • RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • THERAPY
  • EXPERIENCE
  • EFFICACY
  • REGISTRY
  • SAFETY

Cite this