Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

De-centering the (Traditional) user: Multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems

  • Robin Burke*
  • , Gediminas Adomavicius
  • , Toine Bogers
  • , Tommaso Di Noia
  • , Dominik Kowald
  • , Julia Neidhardt
  • , Ozlem Ozgoebek
  • , Maria Soledad Pera
  • , Nava Tintarev
  • , Juergen Ziegler
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved- from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103560
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Volume203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Keywords

  • Recommender systems
  • Evaluation
  • Multistakeholder issues
  • MUSIC
  • DESIGN
  • PERSPECTIVE
  • COMPLEXITY
  • FAIRNESS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'De-centering the (Traditional) user: Multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this