Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?

Stefi Nordkamp*, Stijn H. J. Ketelaers, Floor Piqeur, Harm J. Scholten, Silvie van de Calseijde, Jip L. Tolenaar, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Johanne G. Bloemen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AimPatients requiring a beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) will probably benefit from enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in such groups of patients is considered challenging. The aims of this study were to evaluate ERAS-related outcomes of patients with LARC or LRRC undergoing bTME and to investigate the possibility of designing a tailored ERAS protocol.MethodThis study was divided into four phases. Phase one consisted of a literature study to compare functional recovery and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. In phase two, outcomes on ERAS care elements in bTME were retrospectively evaluated. In phase three, differences in ERAS-related outcomes and compliance of the colorectal ERAS protocol in patients who had undergone bTME were studied. In phase four, multidisciplinary team meetings were held to develop an ERAS protocol for bTME patients.ResultsSeven studies reported on ERAS-related outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. Median length of hospital stay was 9-19 days, median stay in the intensive care unit was 2-4 days and 30-day postoperative major complication rates were 22.6%-61.3%. Seventy-five bTME patients were included for retrospective analysis. In these patients, length of stay was 9.0 days and major postoperative complications were observed in 40.0%. The overall ERAS compliance was 44.4%. Compared with the colorectal ERAS protocol, the largest differences in management were observed in the use of epidural anaesthesia, the postoperative use of urethral catheters, oral intake and mobilization.ConclusionPatients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC are substantially different from patients treated with the colorectal ERAS protocol, regarding ERAS-related outcomes. A tailored, multimodal ERAS protocol with specific modifications was developed by an expert multidisciplinary team for patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1903-1912
Number of pages10
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume26
Issue number11
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • enhanced recovery after surgery
  • locally advanced rectal cancer
  • locally recurrent rectal cancer
  • rectal cancer
  • surgery
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • ANALGESIA
  • RECURRENT
  • RESECTION
  • DRAINAGE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this