Current clinical practice of knee osteotomy in the Netherlands

H.C. Nguyen, J.D. Rietbroek, N. van Egmond, H. Weinans, P.J. Emans, R.J.H. Custers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Realignment osteotomies is gaining popularity amongst Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. Exact numbers and used standards in clinical practice concerning osteotomies are unknown due to the absence of a national registry. The aim of this study was to inves-tigate the national statistics of performed osteotomies, utilized clinical workups, surgical techniques, and post-operative rehabilitation standards in the Netherlands. Method: Dutch orthopaedic surgeons, all members of the Dutch Knee Society, received a web-based survey between January and March 2021. This electronic survey contained 36 questions, subdivided into: general surgeon-related information, number of performed osteotomies, inclusion of patients, clinical workup, surgical techniques, and post-operative management. Results: 86 orthopaedic surgeons filled in the questionnaire, of whom 60 perform realign-ment osteotomies around the knee. All the 60 responders (100%) perform high tibial osteo-tomies and 63.3% additionally perform distal femoral osteotomies, while 30% perform double level osteotomies. Discrepancies in surgical standards were reported regarding to inclusion criteria, clinical workup, surgical techniques, and post-operative strategies. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study got more insight in knee osteotomy clinical practices as applied by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. However, there are still important discrepancies which pleads for more standardization based on available evidence. A (inter)national knee osteotomy registry, and even more so, a (inter)national registry for joint preserving surgeries could be helpful to achieve more standardization and treatment insights. Such a registry could improve all aspects of osteotomies and its combinations with other joint-preserving interventions towards evidence for personalised treatments. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-301
Number of pages10
JournalKnee
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Malalignment
  • Osteotomy
  • Knee
  • Clinical standards
  • Registry
  • HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY
  • OPENING-WEDGE
  • WEIGHT-BEARING
  • IMPLANT REVISION
  • CLOSING-WEDGE
  • RISK
  • OSTEOARTHRITIS
  • RELIABILITY
  • ALIGNMENT
  • FRACTURE

Cite this