TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-community affinity
T2 - A polarization measure for multi-community networks
AU - Nair, Sreeja
AU - Iamnitchi, Adriana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - This article introduces a heterophily-based metric for assessing polarization in social networks when different opposing ideological communities coexist. The proposed metric measures polarization at the node level and is based on a node's affinity for other communities. Node-level values can then be aggregated at the community, network, or any intermediate level, resulting in a more comprehensive map of polarization. We looked at our metric on the Polblogs network, the White Helmets Twitter interaction network with two communities, and the VoterFraud2020 domain network with five communities. Additionally, we evaluated our metric on different sets of synthetic graphs to confirm that it yields low polarization scores, as expected. We employed three ways to build synthetic networks: synthetic labeling, dK-series, and network models, in order to assess how the proposed measure behaves to various topologies and network features. Then, we compared our metric to two commonly used polarization metrics, Guerra's boundary polarization and the random walk controversy score. We also examined how our suggested metric correlates with two network metrics: assortativity and modularity.
AB - This article introduces a heterophily-based metric for assessing polarization in social networks when different opposing ideological communities coexist. The proposed metric measures polarization at the node level and is based on a node's affinity for other communities. Node-level values can then be aggregated at the community, network, or any intermediate level, resulting in a more comprehensive map of polarization. We looked at our metric on the Polblogs network, the White Helmets Twitter interaction network with two communities, and the VoterFraud2020 domain network with five communities. Additionally, we evaluated our metric on different sets of synthetic graphs to confirm that it yields low polarization scores, as expected. We employed three ways to build synthetic networks: synthetic labeling, dK-series, and network models, in order to assess how the proposed measure behaves to various topologies and network features. Then, we compared our metric to two commonly used polarization metrics, Guerra's boundary polarization and the random walk controversy score. We also examined how our suggested metric correlates with two network metrics: assortativity and modularity.
KW - Communities
KW - Heterophily
KW - Polarization
KW - Synthetic networks
U2 - 10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100280
DO - 10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100280
M3 - Article
SN - 2468-6964
VL - 43-44
JO - Online Social Networks and Media
JF - Online Social Networks and Media
M1 - 100280
ER -