Cross-border access to healthcare and entitlement to the complementary "Vanbraekel-Reimbursement"

A.P. van der Mei*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In June 2010, in European Commission v Spain, the Court of Justice concluded that tourists, business people, students and other EU citizens who travel to other Member States, for purposes other than medical treatment, where the rules for insurance cover are less advantageous than at home are not entitled to be reimbursed for the amount covering the difference. The judgment is hard to compare with previous case law, especially since the EU legislator, as the recently adopted Patients' Rights Directive demonstrates, has been willing to recognise a right to such complementary reimbursement. In the field of cross-border access to healthcare, the traditional picture is that in which the Member States seek to curtail the interpretative wings of an, in their view often too expansionist Court. Here, however; we have the unique and reverse situation, in which the Member States and the EU legislature prove to be more "Patient-friendly" than an unnecessarily conservative Court.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-440
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume36
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-border access to healthcare and entitlement to the complementary "Vanbraekel-Reimbursement"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this