Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost-utility of long-term exercise therapy in people with axial spondyloarthritis and severe functional limitations: a randomized, controlled trial

  • Maria. A. T. van Wissen
  • , Salima F. E. van Weely
  • , Cornelia. H. M. van den Ende
  • , Theodora P. M. Vliet Vlieland*
  • , Max M. H. Teuwen
  • , Wilfred. F. Peter
  • , Eline A. M. Mahler
  • , Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
  • , Floris van Gaalen
  • , Johanna P. L. Spoorenberg
  • , Astrid M. van Tubergen
  • , Maaike G. J. Gademan
  • , Wilbert B. van den Hout
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

To evaluate the cost-utility of long-term, personalized, exercise therapy as compared to usual care in people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and severe functional limitations. A comprehensive economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial involving 214 participants (110 individuals assigned to the intervention group and 104 to the usual care group), with a one-year follow-up. Cost assessments encompassed both medical and non-medical costs recorded by participants and healthcare providers. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions -5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Costs and QALY differences were analysed using standard unequal variance t-tests according to the intention-to-treat principle and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. In the intervention group, 93% of the participants used the intervention with an average of 41 (standard deviation, SD 15) sessions, with the mean direct costs of the intervention being & euro;1515 (SD 724) per participant. The total mean physiotherapy costs were & euro;1967 (SD 801) in the intervention and & euro;514 (SD 792) in the control group, respectively. Although not statistically significant, the total societal costs also favoured the usual care group after 52-weeks, showing a difference of & euro;657 (95% confidence interval (CI) & euro;-3748 to & euro;5060). QALYs were slightly and non-significantly favouring the intervention group, with a difference of 0.02 based on the EQ-5D-5 L (95% CI - 0.04 to 0.09) and 0.00 according to the EQ-VAS (95% CI -0.04 to 0.04). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of & euro;50,000 per QALY, the intervention had a 57% likelihood of being considered the cost-effective strategy. The higher intervention costs of the long-term exercise therapy intervention were negated by savings on other healthcare and non-healthcare costs and by improved QALYs. As a result, we found no clear economic preference: long-term exercise therapy need not be withheld for economic reasons from people with axSpA and severe functional limitations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number134
Number of pages13
JournalRheumatology International
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2026

Keywords

  • "Axial Spondyloarthritis & quot
  • [Mesh]
  • "Exercise Therapy & quot
  • "Cost-Benefit Analysis & quot
  • "Quality of life" [Mesh]
  • ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS
  • PHYSICAL-THERAPY
  • VALUING HEALTH
  • SCALE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-utility of long-term exercise therapy in people with axial spondyloarthritis and severe functional limitations: a randomized, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this