Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints

J.J.X.R. Geraets, M.E.J.B. Goossens, C.P.C. de Bruijn, I. de Groot, A.J.A. Köke, R.A. Pelt, G.J. van der Heijden, G.J. Dinant, W.J.A. van Heuvel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral graded exercise therapy (GET) program compared with usual care (UC) in terms of the performance of daily activities by patients with chronic shoulder complaints in primary care. Methods: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned either to GET ( n =87) or to UC ( n =89). Clinical outcomes (main complaints, shoulder disability [SDQ] and generic health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and costs [intervention costs, direct health care costs, direct non?health-related costs, and indirect costs]) were assessed during the 12-week treatment period and at 52 weeks of follow-up. Results: Results showed that GET was more effective than UC in restoring daily activities as assessed by the main complaints instrument after the 12-week treatment period ( p =.049; mean difference, 7.5; confidence interval [CI], 0.0?15.0). These effects lasted for at least 52 weeks ( p =.025; mean difference 9.2; CI, 1.2?17.3). No statistically significant differences were found on the SDQ or EQ5D. GET significantly reduced direct health care costs ( p =.000) and direct non?health care costs ( p =.029). Nevertheless, total costs during the 1-year follow-up period were significantly higher ( p =.001; GET=?530 versus UC=?377) due to the higher costs of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the main complaints (0?100), SDQ (0?100), and EQ-5D (?1.0?1.0) were ?17, ?74, and ?5,278 per unit of improvement, respectively. Conclusions: GET proved to be more effective in the short- and long-term and reduces direct health care costs and direct non?health care costs but is associated with higher costs of the intervention itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-83
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Cite this

Geraets, J.J.X.R. ; Goossens, M.E.J.B. ; de Bruijn, C.P.C. ; de Groot, I. ; Köke, A.J.A. ; Pelt, R.A. ; van der Heijden, G.J. ; Dinant, G.J. ; van Heuvel, W.J.A. / Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints. In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 76-83.
@article{609fa02dab33435088050211c6895c6d,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints",
abstract = "Objectives: The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral graded exercise therapy (GET) program compared with usual care (UC) in terms of the performance of daily activities by patients with chronic shoulder complaints in primary care. Methods: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned either to GET ( n =87) or to UC ( n =89). Clinical outcomes (main complaints, shoulder disability [SDQ] and generic health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and costs [intervention costs, direct health care costs, direct non?health-related costs, and indirect costs]) were assessed during the 12-week treatment period and at 52 weeks of follow-up. Results: Results showed that GET was more effective than UC in restoring daily activities as assessed by the main complaints instrument after the 12-week treatment period ( p =.049; mean difference, 7.5; confidence interval [CI], 0.0?15.0). These effects lasted for at least 52 weeks ( p =.025; mean difference 9.2; CI, 1.2?17.3). No statistically significant differences were found on the SDQ or EQ5D. GET significantly reduced direct health care costs ( p =.000) and direct non?health care costs ( p =.029). Nevertheless, total costs during the 1-year follow-up period were significantly higher ( p =.001; GET=?530 versus UC=?377) due to the higher costs of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the main complaints (0?100), SDQ (0?100), and EQ-5D (?1.0?1.0) were ?17, ?74, and ?5,278 per unit of improvement, respectively. Conclusions: GET proved to be more effective in the short- and long-term and reduces direct health care costs and direct non?health care costs but is associated with higher costs of the intervention itself.",
author = "J.J.X.R. Geraets and M.E.J.B. Goossens and {de Bruijn}, C.P.C. and {de Groot}, I. and A.J.A. K{\"o}ke and R.A. Pelt and {van der Heijden}, G.J. and G.J. Dinant and {van Heuvel}, W.J.A.",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0266462306050860",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "76--83",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints. / Geraets, J.J.X.R.; Goossens, M.E.J.B.; de Bruijn, C.P.C.; de Groot, I.; Köke, A.J.A.; Pelt, R.A.; van der Heijden, G.J.; Dinant, G.J.; van Heuvel, W.J.A.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 76-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of a graded exercise therapy program for patients with chronic shoulder complaints

AU - Geraets, J.J.X.R.

AU - Goossens, M.E.J.B.

AU - de Bruijn, C.P.C.

AU - de Groot, I.

AU - Köke, A.J.A.

AU - Pelt, R.A.

AU - van der Heijden, G.J.

AU - Dinant, G.J.

AU - van Heuvel, W.J.A.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral graded exercise therapy (GET) program compared with usual care (UC) in terms of the performance of daily activities by patients with chronic shoulder complaints in primary care. Methods: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned either to GET ( n =87) or to UC ( n =89). Clinical outcomes (main complaints, shoulder disability [SDQ] and generic health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and costs [intervention costs, direct health care costs, direct non?health-related costs, and indirect costs]) were assessed during the 12-week treatment period and at 52 weeks of follow-up. Results: Results showed that GET was more effective than UC in restoring daily activities as assessed by the main complaints instrument after the 12-week treatment period ( p =.049; mean difference, 7.5; confidence interval [CI], 0.0?15.0). These effects lasted for at least 52 weeks ( p =.025; mean difference 9.2; CI, 1.2?17.3). No statistically significant differences were found on the SDQ or EQ5D. GET significantly reduced direct health care costs ( p =.000) and direct non?health care costs ( p =.029). Nevertheless, total costs during the 1-year follow-up period were significantly higher ( p =.001; GET=?530 versus UC=?377) due to the higher costs of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the main complaints (0?100), SDQ (0?100), and EQ-5D (?1.0?1.0) were ?17, ?74, and ?5,278 per unit of improvement, respectively. Conclusions: GET proved to be more effective in the short- and long-term and reduces direct health care costs and direct non?health care costs but is associated with higher costs of the intervention itself.

AB - Objectives: The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral graded exercise therapy (GET) program compared with usual care (UC) in terms of the performance of daily activities by patients with chronic shoulder complaints in primary care. Methods: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned either to GET ( n =87) or to UC ( n =89). Clinical outcomes (main complaints, shoulder disability [SDQ] and generic health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and costs [intervention costs, direct health care costs, direct non?health-related costs, and indirect costs]) were assessed during the 12-week treatment period and at 52 weeks of follow-up. Results: Results showed that GET was more effective than UC in restoring daily activities as assessed by the main complaints instrument after the 12-week treatment period ( p =.049; mean difference, 7.5; confidence interval [CI], 0.0?15.0). These effects lasted for at least 52 weeks ( p =.025; mean difference 9.2; CI, 1.2?17.3). No statistically significant differences were found on the SDQ or EQ5D. GET significantly reduced direct health care costs ( p =.000) and direct non?health care costs ( p =.029). Nevertheless, total costs during the 1-year follow-up period were significantly higher ( p =.001; GET=?530 versus UC=?377) due to the higher costs of the intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the main complaints (0?100), SDQ (0?100), and EQ-5D (?1.0?1.0) were ?17, ?74, and ?5,278 per unit of improvement, respectively. Conclusions: GET proved to be more effective in the short- and long-term and reduces direct health care costs and direct non?health care costs but is associated with higher costs of the intervention itself.

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462306050860

DO - 10.1017/S0266462306050860

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 76

EP - 83

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 1

ER -