TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Adverse health outcomes among migrant workers and transnational families in the Asia–Pacific
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis” [The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific 2025;64: 101720]
AU - Lin, Rosita Chia-Yin
AU - Lau, Karen
AU - Mackey, Kathryn
AU - Matthews, Natasha Roya
AU - Selvamani, Maushmi
AU - Morais, Beatriz
AU - Bouaddi, Oumnia
AU - Kim, Chaelin
AU - Iwamoto, Azusa
AU - Fujita, Masami
AU - Trummer, Ursula
AU - Dang, Tran Ngoc
AU - Kamenshchikova, Alena
AU - Zimmerman, Cathy
AU - Hargreaves, Sally
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - The authors regret to inform that the first author's name and surname have been reversed for the below 2 authors which is corrected in this correction. Morais Beatriz should be corrected as Beatriz Morais. Bouaddi Oumnia should be corrected to Oumnia Bouaddi. There is a Typographical error in Figure 2. In the “occupational” category, the term “precautious working conditions” is incorrect. It should be corrected to “precarious working conditions”.[Figure presented] There is a minor correction in the Footnote of Table 1. The current text reads: “<50% were defined low quality, 50–70% were average, and <70 as high quality.” The corrected version should be: “<50% were defined as low quality, 50–70% as average, and >70 as high quality.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret to inform that the first author's name and surname have been reversed for the below 2 authors which is corrected in this correction. Morais Beatriz should be corrected as Beatriz Morais. Bouaddi Oumnia should be corrected to Oumnia Bouaddi. There is a Typographical error in Figure 2. In the “occupational” category, the term “precautious working conditions” is incorrect. It should be corrected to “precarious working conditions”.[Figure presented] There is a minor correction in the Footnote of Table 1. The current text reads: “<50% were defined low quality, 50–70% were average, and <70 as high quality.” The corrected version should be: “<50% were defined as low quality, 50–70% as average, and >70 as high quality.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
U2 - 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101774
DO - 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101774
M3 - Erratum / corrigendum
SN - 2666-6065
VL - 65
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
M1 - 101774
ER -