TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: Feasible in clinical practice
AU - Mihl, Casper
AU - Kok, Madeleine
AU - Wildberger, Joachim E.
AU - Altintas, Sibel
AU - Labus, David
AU - Nijssen, Estelle C.
AU - Hendriks, Babs M. F.
AU - Kietselaer, Bas L. J. H.
AU - Das, Marco
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Purpose: Aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that peak injection pressures and image quality using low concentrated contrast media (CM) (240 mg/mL) injected with high flow rates will be comparable to a standard injection protocol (CM: 300 mg/mL) in coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Material and methods: One hundred consecutive patients were scanned on a 2nd generation dual-source CT scanner. Group 1 (n= 50) received prewarmed Iopromide 240 mg/mL at an injection rate of 9 mL/s, followed by a saline chaser. Group 2 (n = 50) received the standard injection protocol: prewarmed Iopromide 300 mg/mL; flow rate: 7.2 mL/s. For both protocols, the iodine delivery rate (IDR, 2.16 gI/s) and the total iodine load (22.5 gI) were kept identical. Injection pressure (psi) was continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Contrast enhancement was measured in the thoracic aorta and all proximal and distal coronary segments. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated between both groups. Results: No significant differences in peak injection pressures were found between both CM groups (121 + 5.6 psi vs. 120 + 5.3 psi, p = 0.54). Flow rates of 9 mL/s were safely injected without any complications. No significant differences in contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality were found (all p >0.05). No significant differences in attenuation levels were found in the thoracic aorta and all segments of the coronary arteries (all p >0.05). Conclusion: Usage of low iodine concentration CM and injection with high flow rates is feasible. High flow rates (9 mL/s) of Iopromide 240 were safely injected without complications and should not be considered a drawback in clinical practice. No significant differences in peak pressure and image quality were found. This creates a doorway towards applicability of a broad variety in flow rates and IDRs and subsequently more individually tailored injection protocols.
AB - Purpose: Aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that peak injection pressures and image quality using low concentrated contrast media (CM) (240 mg/mL) injected with high flow rates will be comparable to a standard injection protocol (CM: 300 mg/mL) in coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Material and methods: One hundred consecutive patients were scanned on a 2nd generation dual-source CT scanner. Group 1 (n= 50) received prewarmed Iopromide 240 mg/mL at an injection rate of 9 mL/s, followed by a saline chaser. Group 2 (n = 50) received the standard injection protocol: prewarmed Iopromide 300 mg/mL; flow rate: 7.2 mL/s. For both protocols, the iodine delivery rate (IDR, 2.16 gI/s) and the total iodine load (22.5 gI) were kept identical. Injection pressure (psi) was continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Contrast enhancement was measured in the thoracic aorta and all proximal and distal coronary segments. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated between both groups. Results: No significant differences in peak injection pressures were found between both CM groups (121 + 5.6 psi vs. 120 + 5.3 psi, p = 0.54). Flow rates of 9 mL/s were safely injected without any complications. No significant differences in contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality were found (all p >0.05). No significant differences in attenuation levels were found in the thoracic aorta and all segments of the coronary arteries (all p >0.05). Conclusion: Usage of low iodine concentration CM and injection with high flow rates is feasible. High flow rates (9 mL/s) of Iopromide 240 were safely injected without complications and should not be considered a drawback in clinical practice. No significant differences in peak pressure and image quality were found. This creates a doorway towards applicability of a broad variety in flow rates and IDRs and subsequently more individually tailored injection protocols.
KW - Diagnostic imaging
KW - Cardiac imaging technique
KW - Contrast media
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Flow injection analysis
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 26277498
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 84
SP - 2155
EP - 2160
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 11
ER -