Coping capacity attenuates the effect of natural disaster risk on conspiracy beliefs

Qi Zhao*, Jan Willem van Prooijen, Giuliana Spadaro

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Natural disasters have threatened human societies throughout history, however, their psychological effects on people are not fully understood. We hypothesized that natural disaster risk and lack of coping capacity are positively related to conspiracy beliefs and tested these relationships across three studies. Study 1 analyzed a global dataset (47,816 participants; 67 countries) and found support for the positive relationships between natural disaster risk, lack of coping capacity, and conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (preregistered; N = 400) manipulated natural disaster risk, yielding the predicted effect on conspiracy beliefs. Study 3 (preregistered; N = 451) introduced an additional manipulation of coping capacity. The results supported our hypothesis that high natural disaster risk predicted increased conspiracy beliefs especially when coping capacity was low. Overall, the findings suggest that improving coping capacity might be effective for governments to reduce people's conspiracy beliefs in the context of natural disasters.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102363
Pages (from-to)1-8
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Conspiracy theories
  • Coping capacity
  • Existential threat
  • Lack of control
  • Natural disasters

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coping capacity attenuates the effect of natural disaster risk on conspiracy beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this