Contingency and Potential: Reconsidering a Dialectical Philosophy of Technology

Darryl Cressman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Unsatisfied with an intellectual history that divides the philosophy of technology into classical and empirical approaches, the following paper suggests a renewed attention to dialectical philosophies of technology. Drawing on the work of Andrew Feenberg, I argue that dialectical philosophies of technology are not essentialist holdovers from the past, but are empirically grounded approaches that direct researchers to ask why we have the technologies we do. From this, dialectical philosophies of technology open up ways to think about technology that prioritize the tension between the sociotechnical world as it is and concrete potentials of what it could be. Contrasting this against postphenomenology, I argue that avoiding these moments of potential can lead to a conservative and paternalistic philosophy of technology that fixes sociotechnical agency to a professional class of designers, engineers, and policy makers. I conclude by suggesting that Feenberg's dialectical philosophy of technology presents a modest alternative to the design imperatives that now guide the trajectory of postphenomenology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-157
JournalTechné: Research in Philosophy and Technology
Volume24
Issue number1/2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contingency and Potential: Reconsidering a Dialectical Philosophy of Technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this