TY - JOUR
T1 - Constructing the accountability of food safety as a public problem in China
T2 - a document analysis of Chinese scholarship, 2008-2018
AU - Yang, Ronghui
AU - Horstman, Klasien
AU - Penders, Bart
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Maastricht University and the Chinese Scholarship Council under grant number 留学金 [2017] 3109. The authors thank Metamorphose Vertalingen [Metamophosis Translations] for assisting with the translations of all Chinese quotes and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/4/3
Y1 - 2022/4/3
N2 - Incessant food safety scandals in China have given rise to a loss of public trust in food safety, stimulating a series of studies focussing on food safety governance, accountability, and trust restoration. Against this backdrop, Chinese scholars are keen to reflect on different strategies for ensuring food safety public accountability and credibility, presenting different perspectives on issues like responsibility, trust, risk communication, and transparency. In this paper, we aim to get more in-depth insight into how Chinese scholarly debates co-construct public accountability for food safety as a public issue. We selected 51 articles from 10,790 candidates drawn from four Chinese academic databases for content analysis. Drawing from political theories on public accountability as well as science and technology studies, the analysis shows that arguments for a specific public accountability model (more or less centralised, more or less stakeholder participation) are intertwined with the specific role of scientific expertise (more or less authoritative, more or less democratising). As such, the analysis shows how scholarly debates on public accountability for food safety in China co-construct a public forum for discussing supervision and accountability, risk assessment, and transparency.
AB - Incessant food safety scandals in China have given rise to a loss of public trust in food safety, stimulating a series of studies focussing on food safety governance, accountability, and trust restoration. Against this backdrop, Chinese scholars are keen to reflect on different strategies for ensuring food safety public accountability and credibility, presenting different perspectives on issues like responsibility, trust, risk communication, and transparency. In this paper, we aim to get more in-depth insight into how Chinese scholarly debates co-construct public accountability for food safety as a public issue. We selected 51 articles from 10,790 candidates drawn from four Chinese academic databases for content analysis. Drawing from political theories on public accountability as well as science and technology studies, the analysis shows that arguments for a specific public accountability model (more or less centralised, more or less stakeholder participation) are intertwined with the specific role of scientific expertise (more or less authoritative, more or less democratising). As such, the analysis shows how scholarly debates on public accountability for food safety in China co-construct a public forum for discussing supervision and accountability, risk assessment, and transparency.
KW - GOVERNANCE
KW - RISK
KW - SCIENCE
KW - Supervision system
KW - TECHNOLOGIES
KW - accountability structure
KW - infrastructures of trust
KW - risk assessment
KW - risk communication
KW - Risk communication
KW - Infrastructures of trust
KW - Risk assessment
KW - Accountability structure
U2 - 10.1080/23812346.2020.1796160
DO - 10.1080/23812346.2020.1796160
M3 - Article
SN - 2381-2346
VL - 7
SP - 236
EP - 265
JO - Journal of Chinese governance
JF - Journal of Chinese governance
IS - 2
ER -