Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constitutional Values and Imperatives in South Africa’s Approach to Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

  • Sarah McGibbon*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter examines South Africa’s approach to extraterritorial jurisdiction, highlighting how its constitutional obligation to protect, respect, promote, and fulfil the rights enshrined in its Bill of Rights informs its engagement with international law. The analysis first establishes South Africa’s constitutional framework, particularly its commitment to human rights, justice, and accountability, which serve as guiding principles in both domestic and international contexts. Through key case law, including Kaunda and the Zimbabwe Torture Docket case, this chapter illustrates how South African courts navigate the tension between constitutional imperatives and the principles of international law, particularly the respect for state sovereignty. Finally, the discussion evaluates South Africa’s stance on universal jurisdiction, demonstrating that by anchoring its approach to extraterritoriality in constitutional mandates and values, the country positions itself as a global leader in human rights protection.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExtraterritoriality Around the Globe: Multiform Approaches in a Multipolar World
EditorsLucia Leontiev, Manuel José Segovia González
PublisherRoutledge/Taylor & Francis Group
Pages307-331
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781040412602
ISBN (Print)9781032515892
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutional Values and Imperatives in South Africa’s Approach to Extraterritorial Jurisdiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this